So, do any pirates here have a grasp in what this asshole feels towards piracy in general? Should we be worried? I’m worried he’ll install an FCC that’ll work against internet rights, that’s one concern.

I’d like to hear what thoughts you have.

  • SitD@lemy.lol
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    3 days ago

    the last 16 years had 4 years of republican rule. the democrats are very responsible for the fact that the feds are going after pirates (crime against rich stakeholders) instead of crimes against the members of the general American demographic as a principle.

    the change from public servants to corporate military is a bipartisan problem, folks

  • Lodespawn@aussie.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    32
    ·
    4 days ago

    I for one welcome the new piracy arms race, every time someone tries to stop piracy, piracy gets easier and more efficient.

  • SquishyPandaDev@yiffit.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    44
    ·
    4 days ago

    He is not going to appoint someone to the FCC. He is going to get rid of it. ISPs are going to be free to do whatever they want with no federal interference.

    • Jediwan@lemy.lol
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      20
      ·
      4 days ago

      He’s not going to “get rid of it”, he’s going to corrupt it. Give spectrum to the biggest donors, reverse net neutrality, get rid of antitrust, revoke broadcast licenses of anyone who criticizes him.

    • diskmaster23@lemmy.one
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      edit-2
      4 days ago

      That also means people can do whatever they want with spectrum. Gonna fuck with Starlink and all kinds of other communications. Afterall, with no FCC, y’all can do whatever you want.

      • Jediwan@lemy.lol
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        4 days ago

        This won’t happen, what will happen is that he revokes the broadcast license of anyone who criticizes the administration and removes all consumer protections against privacy and surveillance. he will repeal section 230 for everyone except X and Truth social.

    • Nyciferi@kbin.melroy.orgOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      4 days ago

      Which might be a blessing in disguise? I mean, for the ISPs that have been actively fighting corporate interests from telling them what to do. With no governmental branch telling them what to do and not wanting to lose many subscribers lest they risk going out of business, then isn’t that a net positive?

      • _cryptagion@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        3 days ago

        With no government oversight, and the nation already cut up into segments by the ISPs so that they have monopolies in their areas, you think the free market is suddenly going to start working like Ancaps say it will and regulate itself in a way that’s good for consumers?

        If you’re the kind of person to believe something like that, then I have a new cryptocurrency you should buy from me. Guaranteed to go to the moon, no rug pull. Trust me, bro.

      • DoucheBagMcSwag@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        3 days ago

        Facebook is now $5.00 a month charge

        Steam access is $20.00 charge

        Countries without net Neutrality are like this. If I believe correctly Belgium is like this.

      • Godort@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        24
        ·
        edit-2
        4 days ago

        This would be a double edged sword. Without regulation, the ISP will work in whichever way grants them the most money.

        This means that they probably won’t go after copyright claims unless the rightsholders pay them first, but they will ramp up data collection efforts to sell to brokerage firms and will also engage in rate-limiting on high-bandwith use cases like streaming or torrenting unless you pay extra.

      • Jediwan@lemy.lol
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        4 days ago

        He won’t just get rid of it, he will wield it as a weapon against anyone who criticizes his administration

      • Kichae@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        4 days ago

        There will be a branch of government telling them what to do. It will just be the courts, as they’re sued into oblivion by IP rights holders.

  • i_stole_ur_taco@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    24
    ·
    4 days ago

    Everything will be fine unless someone shows him an active torrent of The Apprentice and explains he doesn’t get paid residuals if people watch it that way.

    • bamboo
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      4 days ago

      is he paid residuals for theater and streaming sales? 🤮 if so, this would be a great reason to pirate it.

  • SendPicsofSandwiches@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    24
    ·
    4 days ago

    I don’t think he’s been vocal one way or another about piracy, but i wouldn’t be surprised if he appointed a fresh group of jackoffs with something to prove

  • Snot Flickerman
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    22
    ·
    edit-2
    4 days ago

    Well he’s going to make it nigh-impossible to afford electronic equipment or compute power.

    Piracy may be fine, but the tools that facilitate it will be broken.

    Get what you can now, and embrace the return to sneakernets.

  • otter@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    4 days ago

    Worry is the worst use of imagination. The latter can take you all sorts of places, whereas the former is more of a rocking chair: misleadingly distracting but essentially stationary. 🙇🏽‍♂️