• macniel@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    78
    ·
    2 months ago

    Actually we called them Mitläufer (going along with the dominant party in fear of punishment)… but they sure weren’t any better than Nazis.

  • lath@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    30
    ·
    2 months ago

    Sounds like a bunch of shitty historians.

    Of course the motives matter, most of all for a good historian. Those who wish to reconstruct the past shall not be deterred from their goal just because “nobody cares anymore”. Fidelity to an accurate representation of the past is the only acceptable rendition of history, otherwise why even bother.

    • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      2 months ago

      The history of Western Europe, the Middle East, Sub-Saharan Africa, and the Americas is littered with “reformed Nazis” who came out of the 2nd World War pledging themselves to the cause of US/UK Capitalist Imperialism. It is not merely that we disregarded the intentions of the Reluctant Wehrmacht. It is that we found many of these fascists to be useful - either as expendable shock troops during the Cold War or as spies, scientists, and bureaucrats in postwar states still invested in a politically correct form of apartheid.

      You can find the breadcrumb trail of German Fascism leading out of Berlin and into Buenos Aeries, Cape Town, and Huntsville Alabama. These fuckers never actually went away.

      • azertyfun@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        2 months ago

        Don’t forget about the regular capitalists. Many of the richest German industrialists today are direct heirs of Nazis who actively helped Hitler gain power, built a personal empire from slave labor, faced no consequences for their actions, and were allowed to keep operating after the war.

      • lath@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        2 months ago

        They never went away because their ideals were not defeated. They went away into a USA that segregated blacks from whites and had Japanese internment camps. You blame Nazis as the source, but they are merely a symptom of a human condition. And as long as we don’t collectively uplift ourselves, it’s never going to be overcome, no matter how many proponents are killed off or muffled in the background.

  • Zwiebel@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    Ah yes removing nuance, always a win.

    This list is conveniently leaving out the motive of ‘being threatened’, because motives do sometimes matter.

    The proper term is “nazi-collaborateur”.

    And no I am of course not condoning any violence.

    • sp3ctr4l@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      59
      ·
      2 months ago

      I am pretty sure if you join the Nazi party, you are a Nazi.

      A Nazi collaborator would be… a non Nazi, who worked with Nazis.

      • knatschus@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        2 months ago

        Some collaborators had the choice to either join the party later on or openly oppose them. In germany people who joined the party after the war started are often viewed different from those who followed early on.

        Just today i heared a podcast about Werner Foßmann and the fact that he joined the party in the early 30s was a point against him.

      • Zwiebel@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        edit-2
        2 months ago

        Thank you for your nuanced reply and your openness for semantics discussion.

        Provocative question: Do you think then that the US should’ve strangled half the German population instead of just a dozen at the Nuremberg Trials because a Nazi is a Nazi?

        • AhismaMiasma@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          37
          ·
          2 months ago

          No, we strangled the ones in charge and then forced the remainder to literally pay while their country was occupied. A culture of anti-nazism was forced upon the Germans with law.

          Growth is important for everyone. MAGA can still bend the knee and atone for their bigotry.

          • Zwiebel@feddit.org
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            10
            ·
            2 months ago

            No you did not follow the Morgentau Plan. Instead you gave Germany a bunch of money to rebuild under the Marshall Plan, and treated us quite kindly to lead us on the right path. (In contrast to the USSR which took revenge by letting their soldiers rape and loot, and disassembled German industries as repayment. The Soviets also tried to forcibly “denazify” Germany which was unsucsessful.)

            No, we strangled the ones in charge and then […]

            So we agree that there is a difference between Nazis of different caliber, and they’re to be treated differently.

            • AhismaMiasma@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              21
              ·
              edit-2
              2 months ago

              Yeah, the whole crux of my statement was we offed the ones in charge and helped the other ones realize the ghastly error of their ways. By force if necessary, but money tends to work too.

              Unless you’re saying we shouldn’t have fought against Nazis?

              Genuinely confused how people can be defending Nazis in 2024 but… here we are I guess.

              • Zwiebel@feddit.org
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                2 months ago

                I’m not defending Nazis? I just disagree with the post, which I understood calls for people to dismiss nuance and engage a black and white view. Which smells like populism to me

            • BarqsHasBite@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              10
              ·
              2 months ago

              they’re to be treated differently.

              What you’re conflating is being prosecuted for your war crimes. Holy bad faith.

    • Lupus@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      24
      ·
      2 months ago

      The quote clearly states ‘joined the party’, those are NOT collaborateurs, those are members of the Nazi party, or as explained - Nazis.

      Nobody was threatened to join the party, historians agree on that, people who joined were either true believers or did so to gain some sort of advantage.

      The NSDAP, at their peak had 8.5 million members (1945), so around 20-25% of the German population at the time. We can argue about the other 80%, there is some nuance to be found there, of course. But those 20% Nazi Party members were Nazis, no nuance needed.

    • superkret@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      No one was really threatened with violence to join the Nazi party.
      It never was a decision between joining and dying, or joining and going to prison.

      The choice for most was joining or losing an opportunity to advance their career.

      Even the guards at the concentration camps did the job voluntarily. Being offered the position was a chance to live like a medieval lord, with a mansion, servants, and actual direct power over people’s lives. The alternative was to continue living a mediocre life in Germany. That was enough incentive for enough people to staff the camps.