fossilesque@mander.xyzM to Science Memes@mander.xyzEnglish · 4 months agoKnow thy enemymander.xyzexternal-linkmessage-square66fedilinkarrow-up11.25K
arrow-up11.25Kexternal-linkKnow thy enemymander.xyzfossilesque@mander.xyzM to Science Memes@mander.xyzEnglish · 4 months agomessage-square66fedilink
minus-squareUsernameHere@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up68·edit-24 months agoWe aren’t consuming batteries anywhere near the rate we consume oil and coal. Hydrogen even less than batteries. So the amount of ships needed would still be a fraction of what we use now.
minus-squareskillissuer@discuss.tchncs.delinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up13·4 months agonot now, but if hydrogen were to be used as an energy source/storage, then it’d be used plenty. same with batteries
minus-squareSkyeStarfalllinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3·4 months agoWhile true, it’s very unlikely we’ll use hydrogen. It’s very impractical for this use compared to alternatives
minus-squareDogWater@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·4 months agoIf you have water you have hydrogen. there’s no reason to transport hydrogen if they build infrastructure to use it as a fuel they will build a process to make it on site
We aren’t consuming batteries anywhere near the rate we consume oil and coal. Hydrogen even less than batteries.
So the amount of ships needed would still be a fraction of what we use now.
not now, but if hydrogen were to be used as an energy source/storage, then it’d be used plenty. same with batteries
While true, it’s very unlikely we’ll use hydrogen. It’s very impractical for this use compared to alternatives
If you have water you have hydrogen.
there’s no reason to transport hydrogen if they build infrastructure to use it as a fuel they will build a process to make it on site