Often, its asked what the fediverse or lemmy needs more of in terms of content, but are there any specific features or functionality you really feel are lacking?

  • superkret@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    77
    ·
    19 days ago

    Multi-communities.
    So you can create a list of communities over various instances and show all posts in them as if they were one.

    • seaQueue@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      edit-2
      18 days ago

      This is the big one I want too. I’d love to curate topic based feeds from multiple communities so that other people could subscribe to a single coffee feed instead of 5-8 communities that they had to find themselves. I think this would be particularly useful for new people joining Lemmy, it would save a lot of time if they could just sub to a couple of multi’s and start getting content they’re interested in rather than needing to build their sub list entirely from scratch.

    • helloworld55@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      18 days ago

      Yeah. Or just personalized feeds that you could share. I’m sure some instances have a great list of communities that their subscribers follow, that isn’t available on/Local. And going to /All isn’t always a good time. If there was like a /All, but maybe with some extra filters, that users could just subscribe to, that would be awesome

      • ByteJunk@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        18 days ago

        I always use /all, out of curiosity what’s your issue with it? I have nsfw hidden, and have been having a good time.

        • helloworld55@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          18 days ago

          I like /all too, just to be clear. But sometimes I’d like to browse the equivalent of /all, just without politics. Sometimes it’s a little much and the feed could be 70%+ posts about the US election

          Plus, some instances seem to have a certain “style” to them. I feel like it would be cool if there was some currated feeds that instances presented, that include content across multiple instances that fit that “style”. Would just be an easier way to explore those niche communities. It would also kinda solve the issue with having fractured communities for the same topic across multiple instances

    • Admiral Patrick@dubvee.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      18 days ago

      I have this in Tesseract as “Community Groups” (works exactly like you described; browse the group as a custom feed), but I’ve neglected it for some time now. It works, but it’s kind of slow and the sorting/mixing could use some improvement.

      The sorting/mixing used to be better, but Lemmy 0.19.0 removed most of the ranking specs from the API response, so I can only sort on the basics like score, number of comments, and date. :(

  • cybervseas@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    31
    ·
    19 days ago

    Some way of linking to a post somewhere on Lemmy that will open up the post in your logged in instance of Lemmy.

  • edric@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    18 days ago

    Ninja edits. A grace period where you can edit your comment without it showing it was edited. This is usually for typos and formatting mistakes that you notice right after posting your comment. A minute will do.

    • eyeon@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      18 days ago

      rather than allowing edits for invisible edits for X minutes, couldn’t your client just delay actually sending it for X minutes allowing to cancel or edit freely until that point?

      Gmail allows a similar feature and it seems safer in a distributed system than relying on everyone else to respect what happens after you send a raw message and an edit right after

      • everett@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        18 days ago

        Implementing this like Gmail would mean doing it server-side. Handling it in the client would be more error-prone, since your device would have to have a good connection in the future, and if it doesn’t, handle retries and make sure never to double-post.

  • rbn@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    18 days ago

    Back-up/failover instances for communities and users.

    Every user and every admin of a community should be able to assign a failover instance in case the main instance goes down temporarily or permanently. All relevant data (posts, upvotes, settings, password hashes, mod log) would be permanently syched so you could just switch over in case of a downtime and most importantly, no content would be lost.

    If you implement a feature to set the failover instance as your new main instance, that would also implicitly allow you to migrate users and communities elsewhere.

    • Lemminary@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      18 days ago

      Lol I’ve had the experience of others not from my country telling me what the real politics of my country are because they know better than the people living there, apparently. No thanks.

      • ipkpjersi@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        17 days ago

        No, I mean clicking on them and reading them doesn’t mark them as read. You have to manually click the “Mark all as read” button or individually click the “mark as read” arrow button on each of the comments.

  • kubica@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    19 days ago

    Being able to block link posts by host. It is the one of the reasons I use mbin more than lemmy.

    • Admiral Patrick@dubvee.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      18 days ago

      Like, block/hide posts that go to specific domains? i.e hide any posts that link to Facebook?

      (I develop a lemmy app and may be able to add that capability on the frontend)

        • Admiral Patrick@dubvee.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          18 days ago

          Thanks for clarifying.

          I’ll definitely add that. Will probably include a few built-ins since they have a lot of different domains: Facebook, Xhitter, Reddit, etc. Those can be toggled and then add a separate list for the user to add custom domains.

          e.g. Selecting “Reddit” would filter “old.reddit, new.reddit, reddit.com, out.reddit.com, etc” Selecting “Facebook” would filter all of their main and short domains, etc.

          (I usually trawl posts like this to get feature ideas lol)

  • j4k3@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    19 days ago

    Add technical depth by allowing communities to select a default “sort by most recent comment” like a forum. This is the key difference between ADHD content that focuses on time versus forums that focus on depth. Then find a way to integrate these deep threads into the Allfeed. Bridge the gap between forums with depth and PITA user names versus link aggregators with ADHD but recent info and broad scope.

    • copygirl
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      19 days ago

      Is this not what the “active” sorting does?

      • j4k3@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        18 days ago

        To some extent yes, but it is not a default option at the community level. The scope is only as a user setting overall.

        I’m abstracting to analyze a question of why link aggregators do not naturally displace very technical niche forums. I don’t believe that expecting the user to alter their overall sorting method is effective here. Nor do I believe that the pinned thread is an effective prioritization method to promote a more technical niche. In my opinion, the method of prioritization and promotion needs to be organic and democratically sourced as a fundamental mechanism that drives community behavior.

        The part that I cannot intuitively work out is how to integrate the old niche threads with the aggregated feed in a way that is nonauthoritative or forced or feels like a narrative agenda. How to both enable content discovery while enabling depth is an interesting challenge that could IMO surpass any current or previous link aggregation platform’s functionality and use in such a way as to antiquate all previous platforms.