• Carrolade@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      41
      ·
      24 days ago

      Yeah, but then they’d have to start paying federal income taxes. That’s a big part of why their statehood referendums are always so close, it’s a legit pros and cons list.

      Last time “yes” did win by just a few percentage points though.

      • Rhaedas@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        30
        ·
        24 days ago

        The citizens do seem to be split between the choices, and in the end it is and should be up to them. I find it not surprising that the biggest reason for opposition outside PR is because it would change the balance of senators. Which is rich, since Congress as a whole needs a revamp in representation count in the House anyway, but we’ve held to an outdated number because it’s “hard” to change.

        I read there’s another possible option - go back under Spanish governance. I wonder how much support that even gets, or if Spain would even want it.

        • twistypencil@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          20
          ·
          24 days ago

          There is another option, it’s independence. That third camp is not as popular but it’s full of the most romantic of the boriquas

            • prole
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              5
              ·
              edit-2
              23 days ago

              Well to be fair, at least the UK had representation in the EU.

              Also, obviously, they’d call it “Prexit”