• Ptsf@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    2 months ago

    Should probably read things before chiming in. At least, if they’re pivotal to the conversation.

    • Ghostwurm@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      Not going to digest an entire article for a link with no context, which on its face doesn’t suggest the actions of an individual. Why would I pick out that aspect? Why am I the defender against allegations of bad behavior? That’s ridiculous.

      Edit: when I first responded there was no direct link to the allegations section, it was just the wiki for the movie. A link without context saying “fuck this”. But hey, people apparently know the intentions of strangers from a single hot take, what a skill. Enjoy your echo chamber.

      • dandelion
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        2 months ago

        At first I had no link, but I quickly edited to add the link, however I only ever linked directly to the “allegations of misconduct” section of the wikipedia article. You might be remembering incorrectly?

        EDIT: I don’t know if there is a way to view edit history in Lemmy to clarify, because of course it’s possible I’m remembering incorrectly - but what I do remember is that when I edited to add the link, I linked directly to that section.