• LANIK2000@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    5 hours ago

    It’s refreshing to see a western country say no to bullshit for once. There are lines that when crossed should have consequences.

    • Saleh@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      33
      ·
      11 hours ago

      The UN is a diplomatic institution. It is vital and by design that they talk with everyone. China and Russia are two of the UN Security Council veto powers. Calling the Secretary General a “dipshit” for doing his job is like calling a Judge a dipshit for throwing out illegally obtained evidence.

  • harrys_balzac@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    13 hours ago

    The Secretary-general of the UN visiting a country whose leader has a warrant out for his arrest certainly doesn’t send any sort of message, like that money talks.

    • Saleh@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      11 hours ago

      The Secretary General has little to do with the ICC. Enforcement of UN rules is done by its members. Turns out veto powers being able to veto protects them from a lot of accountability.

      • McDropout@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        9 hours ago

        Maybe it has something to do with the Ukrainian neo-nazi dictator supporting literal zionist terrorists who attack the UN.

        • shottymcb@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          edit-2
          3 hours ago

          The Jewish neo-nazi? Why don’t you just post with your hexbear or lemmygrad account so those who have defederated with your unhinged bullshit don’t have to waste time reading it?

        • prole
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          14
          ·
          edit-2
          6 hours ago

          That’s it guys, keep identifying yourselves so I can get you all tagged and I know who to ignore. Thanks for the help!

    • Skua@kbin.earth
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      42
      ·
      18 hours ago

      Strictly speaking there aren’t term limits for the UN Secretary General. By convention it’s five years per term, two terms max. Guterres is currently three years into his second term.

      Honestly though I’m not sure that him attending the BRICS thing is a bad move. Surely his job is to try to foster discussion across hostile lines? I don’t know what his actual conduct at the conference was, but I can definitely imagine that an attempt to push for peace is within plausibility