minus-squareTxzK@lemmy.ziplinkfedilinkarrow-up81·9 hours agoI just love how literary no one involved even acknowledged the existence of Threads lmfao.
minus-squareOrbituary@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up21·9 hours agoLiterary or literally? (hint: neither are correct.)
minus-squareswitchboard_pete@fedia.iolinkfedilinkarrow-up37·8 hours agoliterally is objectively correct in this context
minus-squareVoltage@lemmy.dbzer0.comlinkfedilinkarrow-up7·8 hours agoI used to see people having some sort of threads number on their instagram profile, now sometimes i forget that even exists lol
minus-squareFiat126OPlinkfedilinkarrow-up4·9 hours agoi haven’t heard of anyone actually using it, but I’ve heard of people using the others
I just love how literary no one involved even acknowledged the existence of Threads lmfao.
Literary or literally? (hint: neither are correct.)
literally is objectively correct in this context
Literaryly
The latter is correct, no?
I used to see people having some sort of threads number on their instagram profile, now sometimes i forget that even exists lol
i haven’t heard of anyone actually using it, but I’ve heard of people using the others
… MILF Messenger?
you did 🙀