• SassyRamen@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      23 minutes ago

      Why does his hand become a part of his jacket? What secrets lie behind that mustache? Will anyone call for a doctor?

    • OldWoodFrame@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      7 hours ago

      Honestly thank god even Trump isn’t narcissistic enough to think he looks good without a shirt.

    • TotalFat@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      24
      ·
      10 hours ago

      Now do one where Trump’s a centaur being ridden hard by Putin. Or the old two-person horse costume with Trump in the ass. No pun intended.

  • cabbage@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    150
    ·
    15 hours ago

    I feel like part of the problem is that people don’t expect fascism to be so goddamn pathetic. They see obvious morons like this or Trump, and they struggle to imagine how they could possibly be dangerous.

    I guess the lesson from history here is that just because they’re ridiculous it doesn’t make them any less dangerous.

    • WoodScientist@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      5 hours ago

      Hitler’s book was literally titled “my struggle.” His whole shtick was “I’m just this poor downtrodden Everyman trying to help the country, but the bad people won’t let me!”

        • nomous@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          7 hours ago

          And also sit idly by while his cult tries to seize power, knowing they won’t be the first against the wall.

          • Tinidril@midwest.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            3 hours ago

            So, everyone who has a problem with how the Democrats run things is an enemy? Gosh, why does that sound familiar?

            This is the attitude you take, then you wonder why there isn’t more unity against the Republicans. If you want to know how fascism wins, this is it.

            • nomous@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              2 hours ago

              So, everyone who has a problem with how the Democrats run things is an enemy? Gosh, why does that sound familiar?

              Cool strawman.

              This is the attitude you take, then you wonder why there isn’t more unity against the Republicans. If you want to know how fascism wins, this is it.

              Fascism wins by people voting for fascists and by milquetoast moderates going along with it because they won’t be first against the wall. If that seems so offensive to you then you deserve to be offended.

              • Tinidril@midwest.social
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                1 hour ago

                It’s hardly a strawman. Based on nothing but a statement that many Americans who don’t buy into Trump’s cult are still discontent with the system, you presumed that all of them, or at least a significant majority, are either against your rights, or at least willing to sacrifice them for some unspecified reason.

                There is no conflict between being against the mass hording of wealth that plagues this country, and supporting the freedoms of disadvantaged groups. You seem awfully willing to abandon the fight for the economic prosperity for all Americans, not because it helps your minority, but because you get to be smug while society crumbles.

                If the message is that people should vote for the lesser of two evils, especially to protect vulnerable classes, I’m right with you. If the message is “shut up about what’s wrong with the Democratic party” then you are playing right into Republican strategy.

                The Democrats don’t want you dead, but they don’t really care much if you live or die. The Democratic establishment is consistently the last on board for minority rights. Look at gay marriage for example. It wasn’t until the idea became overwhelmingly popular that establishment Democrats came on board. The Defense of Marriage Act and “Don’t ask, don’t tell” both had overwhelming support from the Democratic establishment. Even then, gay marriage was enacted by the Supreme Court, and the Democrats have made no effort whatsoever to protect it in legislation, just like RvW.

                At least the Republicans are honest in a warped way. Democrats hold minority interests hostage to further their own financial interests. They want your neck perpetually on the chopping block because they benefit from your peril. It’s a game they play and, one time or another, it will be you that loses.

      • Sir_Kevin@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        51
        ·
        11 hours ago

        You weren’t kidding! Here’s an excerpt…

        Its chief officer was the Grand Cyclops, who appointed two Nighthawks, a Grand Turk, a Grand Sentinel, Grand Magi and a Grand Ensign in addition to his Grand Scribe. The Grand Cyclops, Grand Exchequer, Grand Magi (second officer) and Grand Monk (third officer) were elected by the body politic of the dens, identified as Ghouls.

        What the actual fuck?

        • Codex@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          5 hours ago

          Check out the Behind the Bastards podcast. Robert did a couple on the origins of the KKK and, yeah, they started out basically as a “retvrn to tradition” D&D group who got rebooted into racist terrorists. Bunch of pathetic nerds seeking power and finding it in violent terror.

        • 🔍🦘🛎@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          8 hours ago

          Yeah this makes me afraid that I’m going to homebrew some NPCs that accidentally follow this naming scheme too closely

  • Cruxifux@feddit.nl
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    201
    ·
    17 hours ago

    The obsession with right wing leaders to look masculine while having absolutely no clue on how to actually be a manly man is fascinating.

    • Bertuccio@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      7 hours ago

      It’s staged in that every element is fake.

      When they take photos of Obama playing basketball, Trump golfing, etc. the subjects are still actually doing those things and actually do them off-camera as pastimes. The comms people are taking real interests and skills of their clients and casting them in the best possible light. The circumstances are staged, but the pastimes are not.

      Mussolini never harvested any wheat and Trump never worked at McDonald’s. The comms people are completely fabricating their client’s interests and skills.

      It’s not even Dirty Jobs levels of slumming it where they actually do the job but get paid thousands of times more and go to a fancy hotel at the end of the day. They’re just models.

      • sweetpotato@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        6 hours ago

        Everything they say, everything they do, every interaction with another person, every camera shot taken, everything is staged and planned ahead by teams. Their character is staged, their expressions are staged, so what’s different? The fact that they may do something like that, though differently, once in a while? The goal is still the same, to connect with voters and to create a more likeable and relatable image of them. Regardless if other candidates have not explicitly dressed up as workers of a field they’ve never worked for. They film themselves going to factories listening to people, talking to people in the streets and all of that is 100% controlled, so I don’t see the difference. It’s not like anyone claims Trump works in McDonald’s for years, they don’t fabricate anything more than any other campaigner does.

        The distinction you make doesn’t have a tangible meaning to it, all of them are showing something staged based on data science, psychology and communication and nothing else.

    • kofe@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      10 hours ago

      Words can have multiple meanings. Harris didn’t go to McDonald’s and work a shift as a politician to get the photo op. Her showing up for her “shift” at the White House isn’t any more staged, imo. If you want to say that the entire White House is staged, shit like that, then by that metric everyone’s job is staged. Which, hey, if you find value in “staging” your home or work area, that’s great. I think we should differentiate how Trump & Mussolini here clearly made their decision to do these jobs for just long enough for cameras and potential voters, though. There’s really no other substance to take away from the pictures.

      • sweetpotato@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        9 hours ago

        Jesus christ, can you people stop meatriding Harris for a millisecond? How do you make this about her?

        Do you understand the meaning of the word staged? I was talking about the fact that any appearance of any (important) politician ever is controlled by a team of people specialized in communication. They want to obviously portray the politician in the best light possible, every impression counts. It’s not a fascism thing, every politician constructs and curates their image to accomplish their goals and pass the messages they want to the people. Unless you think that these two rich politicians and the billions they get as campaign funding from other rich people are spent on pizza parties and that the videos and pictures they take are authentic lmfao

        • kofe@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          8 hours ago

          I’m in a charged enough environment that seeing your aggressive language is too much for me to read beyond three sentences. It doesn’t seem you read my full comment based on those three, anyway. You don’t need to reply or repeat yourself but if you don’t mind clarifying, would you mind considering running it by ChatGPT or something to make sure it’s civil first? I don’t think my comment warranted this attitude. Thank you.

          • sweetpotato@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            edit-2
            8 hours ago

            You are right, I’m sorry for my aggressiveness. My point was that any big politician stages any public appearance and video they make, because they all have a very big team of communication experts who curate the best possible image for them. There is no authenticity ever and that’s why so much money is spent on the campaigns. Staging a campaign is not a fascism issue, but a big politics issue

            • kofe@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              5 hours ago

              I see where you’re coming from. It could branch out to any person or organization, though, wouldn’t you think? Like I brought up in my original comment, I “stage” my home for myself, firstly, because it makes me feel comfortable. I also do a lot of video calls for work, school, and with friends. So I wonder where the delineation is. When and why does it become inauthentic?

              • sweetpotato@lemmy.ml
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                2 hours ago

                You don’t spend millions on data analysts who gather voter data from social media, government data advertisers and other sources, you don’t have photographers, videographers for every public appearance of yours, you don’t have psychologists and communication specialists who decide what you’ll say, do and express with your face. In general, you don’t plan ahead every move you make when people will see you and you don’t control your entire environment, the people you will interact with and what you will see and do every time.

                You seem to have a really simplistic/naive view of how politics work at this level with the analogy of an ordinary person you gave. You need to realize that these people have absolutely nothing to do with you or me. These people will never tell you who they are funded by, who are lobbying them, who they owe to, who influences them, who threatens them and why they take most decisions, they will lie, they will hide their wealth, they will hide their ties. The only reason they are able to compete for presidency is the fact that the rich people support them, because their media take their side(channels, newspapers, websites) and their money fund their campaigns. So they will always, necessarily serve their interests, that’s the deal, otherwise they will drop them and go to the next willing politician. This means that the big politicians can never tell the truth.

                So with all that said, the fakeness of their campaign reflects the irreconcilable situation they are in, having to serve the 0.1% and having the people as a means to this end.

                • kofe@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  1 hour ago

                  Again with insults? I don’t think I’ll be continuing to reply. Have a good one.