return2ozma@lemmy.world to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 4 months agoT-Mobile, AT&T oppose unlocking rule, claim locked phones are good for usersarstechnica.comexternal-linkmessage-square78fedilinkarrow-up1496cross-posted to: politics@sh.itjust.worksnews@lemmy.world
arrow-up1496external-linkT-Mobile, AT&T oppose unlocking rule, claim locked phones are good for usersarstechnica.comreturn2ozma@lemmy.world to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 4 months agomessage-square78fedilinkcross-posted to: politics@sh.itjust.worksnews@lemmy.world
minus-squareDaddleDew@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up43·edit-24 months agoIs there a technical term for when a company or corporation makes a statement that is a blatant bad faith argument like that? If none exists, I’d call it “Corporate massturbation”. Because they’re trying to jerk everyone off. Edit Here’s another one: “Corporate Anal Ostriching.” Because they’re shoving their heads up their own asses
Is there a technical term for when a company or corporation makes a statement that is a blatant bad faith argument like that?
If none exists, I’d call it “Corporate massturbation”. Because they’re trying to jerk everyone off.
Edit Here’s another one: “Corporate Anal Ostriching.” Because they’re shoving their heads up their own asses
Gaslighting?
Not even close.
Propaganda