Silverchase@sh.itjust.works to Math MemesEnglish · 4 个月前Proof by fucking obviousnesssh.itjust.worksimagemessage-square66fedilinkarrow-up1386
arrow-up1386imageProof by fucking obviousnesssh.itjust.worksSilverchase@sh.itjust.works to Math MemesEnglish · 4 个月前message-square66fedilink
minus-squarepseudo@jlai.lulinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·4 个月前 Then again, I thought 1+1=2 is axiomatic (2 being the defined by having a count of one and then another one) So I don’t understand why Bertrand Russel had to spend 86 pages proving it from baser fundamentals. It is mathematic. Of course it has to be proved.
It is mathematic. Of course it has to be proved.