Silverchase@sh.itjust.works to Math MemesEnglish · 7 months agoProof by fucking obviousnesssh.itjust.worksimagemessage-square66linkfedilinkarrow-up1388
arrow-up1388imageProof by fucking obviousnesssh.itjust.worksSilverchase@sh.itjust.works to Math MemesEnglish · 7 months agomessage-square66linkfedilink
minus-squarepseudo@jlai.lulinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·6 months ago Then again, I thought 1+1=2 is axiomatic (2 being the defined by having a count of one and then another one) So I don’t understand why Bertrand Russel had to spend 86 pages proving it from baser fundamentals. It is mathematic. Of course it has to be proved.
It is mathematic. Of course it has to be proved.