ByteOnBikes@slrpnk.net to linuxmemes@lemmy.world · 3 days agoIn light of Linux removing ReiserFSslrpnk.netimagemessage-square36fedilinkarrow-up1253
arrow-up1253imageIn light of Linux removing ReiserFSslrpnk.netByteOnBikes@slrpnk.net to linuxmemes@lemmy.world · 3 days agomessage-square36fedilink
minus-squareQuarterSwede@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up16·3 days agoThat’s why it’s still being used. Not a major reason to move on for MS. Sad to see APFS not on the list (I know why, just wanted to compare).
minus-squaresik0fewl@lemmy.calinkfedilinkarrow-up7·3 days agoNot sure if it’s gotten better in the last few years, but it’s also incredibly slow. Like orders of magnitude slower than ext3 or HFS.
minus-squareQuarterSwede@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up3·3 days agoI’ve never thought of APFS as slow. Didn’t realize it was.
minus-squaresik0fewl@lemmy.calinkfedilinkarrow-up11·3 days agoOops, replied to wrong comment! I was talking about NTFS.
That’s why it’s still being used. Not a major reason to move on for MS.
Sad to see APFS not on the list (I know why, just wanted to compare).
Not sure if it’s gotten better in the last few years, but it’s also incredibly slow. Like orders of magnitude slower than ext3 or HFS.
I’ve never thought of APFS as slow. Didn’t realize it was.
Oops, replied to wrong comment! I was talking about NTFS.