• GarbageShoot [he/him]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    1 year ago

    What each of us sees as cohesive is naturally going to diverge, but it’s good to offer thesis statements and I did not, so let me do that here:

    The US is a despot in how it treats other countries. It was a despot in the 20th century and it is a despot in the 21st century. Its crimes are innumerable and frankly still overwhelming if you just focus on the big ones. Nonetheless, if someone says the US is interested in promoting “democracy,” it is necessary to bring some of the obvious counterexamples to bear.

    Lastly, if you aren’t familiar with this history, it’s perfectly fine to just be quiet and either research or do something else, but to make declarations means inviting those declarations to be attacked, and making poorly-informed declarations and then being incredulous about being given information is silly.

    This is the first I’ve heard about the OAS. I don’t support the Trump administration and it sounds like they supported what OAS did, so I probably don’t support what OAS did. If that makes you feel better.

    Hey, that’s something, but it’s worth mentioning that the Biden administration didn’t exactly offer reparations. Thankfully, the coup regime (under Jeanine Áñez if you want a term to look up) had already crumbled before Biden took office, but based on his other actions he would have supported it just as Trump did if it lasted a few months longer so it could see his Presidency.

    If you oppose Trump for reasons other than him being crass, saying bad things, and personally engaging in sex crime (the latter two being real reasons to dislike him, mind you), then it’s consistent to oppose Biden as well.

    I’m certainly not an expert on every US foreign policy action or every foreign policy action by every international organization. It’s hard to have informed opinions about things I literally just learned about. I can offer first impressions, but I’m guessing those will change as I get to learn more about it.

    As I said before, ignorance is not a sin, but if you aren’t aware of things, don’t make declarations about them. If you don’t have any idea what someone has been up to in the past 20 years, declaring that they have never committed a crime in their life is not a safe practice.

    First I’ve heard about this too.

    OIF, or Operation Iraqi Freedom, is the official name of the Iraq invasion. It’s easy to remember because it was supposedly first called “Operation Iraqi Liberty” before someone noticed that that spells “OIL,” which is a much better characterization of what the US was after rather than “spreading democracy”.

    I was talking about Afghanistan and Iraq.

    The US fled Afghanistan and the Taliban won. Mind you, while I don’t like the Taliban, it’s better for them to be in charge than the colonial occupier the US had been trying to act as for 20 fucking years. If there is to be hope for Afghanistan in the dilemma between the Taliban and US, we must agree that the local force that actually has some stake in the country doing well is the better option.

    You can see why I didn’t think you meant Iraq and Afghanistan given this. As an aside, it should be noted that the US government broadly does not view the case of Libya as a failure. Hillary Clinton (then Secretary of State, who oversaw the “intervention”) famously said with a cackle “We came, we saw, he died!” referring to Libya’s former head-of-state, Gaddafi, who she watched on video being sodomized to death with a bayonet while begging for mercy.

    I can read the history books thanks.

    Written by who? And for what institution?* We cannot be uncritical of something speaking well of the US merely because it got published somewhere and happened to be served to you.

    *These are rhetorical questions, you might benefit from looking them up, but you don’t need to tell me (and if you mean school textbooks, you probably shouldn’t)

    I don’t need to defend ever single thing the US has done wrong or what you think the US has done wrong to enjoy and understand the benefits of democracy.

    Essentially, I am trying to draw your attention to what the US overwhelmingly is, despite your attempts to dismiss as mere trivia events that each killed tens or hundreds of thousands and impoverished millions.

    You get scraps from this looting, I would never deny that, but for most of the world the US is a cancer and those two facts are connected. It would not have this loot if it was not pillaging it, and you have no say in whether or not it does if you are only following the “democracy” you applaud because both parties are the pro-war party.

    US is certainly not perfect but it beats living in a dictatorship that’s for sure. I want the US to support and defend democracies. I don’t feel the moral need to disown my country because it has screwed up, but I’m not above criticizing it either.

    These atrocities, committed without interruption or even a valid military engagement since the end of WW2, are not mistakes, they are not “screw ups,” they are the standard functioning of the US and inextricable from what it is. I don’t know what sort of conservative high school history courses you are operating on, but they have not served you well. That makes sense, because they aren’t made to serve you, they are made so that you will serve this machine that we’ve been discussing.

    • ToastedPlanet
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      As I said before, ignorance is not a sin, but if you aren’t aware of things, don’t make declarations about them.

      I’ll report on what I see when I google. If that’s a declaration so be it. I don’t see a problem with trying to get another person to pin down what they believe. Although trying to guess hasn’t been particularly effective.

      OIF, or Operation Iraqi Freedom, is the official name of the Iraq invasion. It’s easy to remember because it was supposedly first called “Operation Iraqi Liberty” before someone noticed that that spells “OIL,” which is a much better characterization of what the US was after rather than “spreading democracy”.

      I didn’t recognize the acronym, but I know about the Iraq invasion.

      These atrocities, committed without interruption or even a valid military engagement since the end of WW2, are not mistakes, they are not “screw ups,” they are the standard functioning of the US and inextricable from what it is.

      After WWII, the US government made deliberate foreign policy decisions they thought would benefit Americans and people abroad and then in some cases they didn’t. In some they did. The goal was to not harm as many civilians as possible. Civilian causalities are definitely a screw up. If you’re going to subscribe to a view that sees the US as inherently evil then you’re not going to have a realist view of the world or history.

      The US fled Afghanistan and the Taliban won. Mind you, while I don’t like the Taliban, it’s better for them to be in charge than the colonial occupier the US had been trying to act as for 20 fucking years. If there is to be hope for Afghanistan in the dilemma between the Taliban and US, we must agree that the local force that actually has some stake in the country doing well is the better option.

      The Taliban regime doesn’t care about the people living under their rule. They care about imposing their version of Islam on everyone. This is my issue with the world view I’m seeing in the comments. If what the US government has been doing bothers you on a moral level, then what a theocratic dictatorship does to its own people should bother you greatly. The hope I have for the people of Afghanistan is that they overthrow their oppressors. edit: typos

      • GarbageShoot [he/him]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        I’ll report on what I see when I google. If that’s a declaration so be it.

        You know you can do things other than make nebulous assertions, right? You can say “I don’t know” or “It seems to me that” or any number of other things that aren’t just “X is the case”. If you’re ignorant about US FP, and you are, you can just not declare what its overall purpose is. No one is forcing you to do something like that!

        After WWII, the US government made deliberate foreign policy decisions they thought would benefit Americans and people abroad and then in some cases they didn’t. In some they did. The goal was to not harm as many civilians as possible. Civilian causalities are definitely a screw up. If you’re going to subscribe to a view that sees the US as inherently evil then you’re not going to have a realist view of the world or history.

        You did a flip-flop from your earlier (correct) claim that the US was seeking power and destroying its enemies in the 20th century, unless you think WW2 happened in 2000. They used people to their own advantage consistently, and civilian casualties were not “screw ups” because they didn’t give a shit.

        I’m a Marxist, I don’t think “good” and “evil” are useful terms for analyzing the world beyond analyzing ideologies containing the ideas of “good and evil”. I don’t think the US has some sort of evil magic curse that makes it only do bad, I think that it has constructed a model of warmongering and exploitation around the world that didn’t evaporate at the stroke of Y2K. It’s an imperialist state, its basic functioning is centered on looting the third world through various means, and this is informed by its legal system and class structure.

        The Taliban regime doesn’t care about the people living under their rule. They care about imposing their version of Islam on everyone. This is my issue with the world view I’m seeing in the comments. If what the US government has been doing bothers you on a moral level, then what a theocratic dictatorship does to its own people should bother you greatly. The hope I have for the people of Afghanistan is that they overthrow their oppressors.

        The Taliban isn’t controlled by an idea, it is controlled by people operating on motives that are usually material. Public will and diplomatic external pressure can change things based on affecting those motives, but to the US Afghanistan is a weapon or a source of income that can be clung to or discarded (as it ultimately did). No amount of domestic unrest would persuade the US to help people, because Afghanistan just isn’t important to the US, it can’t really hurt the US.

        And the Taliban’s support isn’t an idea or magic “authoritarianism” either. Most of its support was from decent people who saw it as the only viable path towards opposing US colonialism, which it ultimately successfully did. Having succeeded, the Taliban will need to find new projects that the people will support or else it will lose standing (and it had been taking up such projects of development since long before the US left).

        • ToastedPlanet
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          No one is forcing you to do something like that!

          I’m doing my best to keep up with a slew of unrelated topics. I got a name of a country and I reported what I was able to find about it. Keep making a big deal out of nothing if you like.

          I’ve done my best to describe my world view as consistently as possible. I think you have done the same. If something seems inconsistent or flip flopping I apologize. The US did some good things like rebuilding western Europe after WWII.

          I’m a Marxist, I don’t think “good” and “evil” are useful terms for analyzing the world beyond analyzing ideologies

          And yet the main take away I can get is that America is inherently evil to you. You don’t see America as people living in a democracy, but as some kind of unchangeable corporate murder machine which has no basis in reality. Your views of the Taliban are also detached from reality. The Taliban rules with an iron fist. They will cut off as many heads as they can to remain in power. They deny education to women and girls who have to study in secret. Authoritarianism is real, I highly recommend you learn about it. If you’re seriously going to uphold the Taliban as some kind of champion of the people, rather than ruthless oppressors then I don’t think we can a meaningful discussion on ethical and moral issues. You’re welcome to try, but I doubt we will find much common ground.

          https://www.bbc.com/news/world-asia-63624400

          Foreign intervention is not inherently colonialism and the local authority in a country is not inherently good.