• ToastedPlanet
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    196 was creepy and chaser-y about trans folks?

    Not from what I’ve heard. edit:spacing

          • ToastedPlanet
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            Are you talking about this guy?

            https://knowyourmeme.com/memes/people/vaush

            I didn’t participate in 196 when I was on Reddit. And I’ve just now learned about Vaush. For what it’s worth, I haven’t seen him mentioned on this 196.

            Although I’m pro-NATO. I’ve no way to know how representative that stance is of the general user base of this instance. But I’m of the opinion that it’s a common position.

            • autismdragon [he/him, comrade/them]@hexbear.net
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              12
              ·
              1 year ago

              I really don’t understand how someone can come the conclusion that NATO is a good thing? :/ They’ve carried out some absolutely awful military operations that have taken many lives. They are not, in any way, a “defensive alliance” and have never acted like one. Like, the bare minimum that I ask is “Russia and NATO are both bad” (and thats not even wrong, its just said in bad faith sometimes). But outright saying NATO is good? :/

                • autismdragon [he/him, comrade/them]@hexbear.net
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  12
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  “The west” as a whole does not have a right to defend itself. “The west” is not a nation. Considering it one has white supremacist vibes, I’m sure from your other posts that you don’t intend them, but the implications are there.

                  You have been lied to about Yugoslavia. In fact, the bombing of Yugoslavia would have been one of the atrocities I brought up, considering the 500 civilian deaths and 6000 civilian wounded that resulted from it. At the very least, while there may have been a genocide going on there, NATO’s goals were not to stop it. It was an excuse to enforce further western hegemony over the region. I Unfortunately I am not prepared with sources on that issue so I hope someone else in this thread will come through with some for you. I always forget to bookmark sources even though I know I’ll need them later. You’ll just hopefully trust me that I have read stuff about this before. I just forgot to save it.

                  Lastly, its stated goals mean nothing to me when they supported the invasion of Afghanistan (as just one example). Was that a defensive war?

                  • ToastedPlanet
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    2
                    ·
                    1 year ago

                    “The west” as a whole does not have a right to defend itself. “The west” is not a nation. Considering it one has white supremacist vibes, I’m sure from your other posts that you don’t intend them, but the implications are there.

                    We have the collective right to defend ourselves. Individually any one European nation would be hard pressed to defend against Russia on its own. I don’t see how self defense gives off white supremacy vibes. NATO existing as a defensive alliance doesn’t prevent anyone else from doing the same thing.

                    Bookmarking stuff can get quickly out of hand. If you find it later post it here I guess. I think we are going to have agree to disagree. There was genocide happening in Yugoslavia. NATO intervened to stop it. Not everything is a conspiracy.

                    Lastly, its stated goals mean nothing to me when they supported the invasion of Afghanistan (as just one example). Was that a defensive war?

                    The Taliban harbored al-Qaeda which used Afghanistan as its base of operations when it coordinate the 9/11 and 7/7 terrorist attacks. So yes.

                  • ToastedPlanet
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    ·
                    1 year ago

                    So this is the PPB right? What do you think this achieves besides sharing a funny picture? Or is it just a way to mark me for being swarmed?

                  • ToastedPlanet
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    ·
                    1 year ago

                    The sarcasm has not been missed. Yugoslavia was where the Bosnian genocide took place, NATO intervened. Afghanistan harbored al-Qaeda. Honestly Iraq seems like it was a personal vendetta for Bush backed up by his think tank that thought they could impose democracy.

            • sharedburdens [she/her, comrade/them]@hexbear.net
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              12
              ·
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              The observed baseline for libs on reddit is defending obama-drone as if it’s a left wing position because the republicans are ‘worse’, with lots of unexamined western chauvinism piled on top, and hostile debate-me-debate-me misogyny if you push back on it.

              Obama was president when NATO returned the slave trade to Libya- to quote his secretary of state Hillary Clinton: “we came, we saw, he died”. I’m sure you have all sorts of state-approved positions on Americas state enemies, but that’s the historical reality you’re whitewashing.

              • ToastedPlanet
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                1 year ago

                I’ll admit my knowledge on US involvement in Libya is lacking. I was a junior in high school at the time and I don’t remember hearing much about it. I’ll have to read up on it if I’m going to debate it with you. At a glance, it looks Obama would agree with you. Reestablishing the slave trade in Libya doesn’t seem to be the outcome he was hoping for. edit: typo

                https://www.newsweek.com/obama-responsible-libyan-slave-trade-730875

                • CW: Worst mistake?

                  Obama: Probably failing to plan for the day after, what I think was the right thing to do, in intervening in Libya.

                  From the article you just posted, I clicked the link to read what he actually said, and I read it as he expressed regret for not intervening more!

                  It’s like criminals expressing regret for getting caught.

                  • ToastedPlanet
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    ·
                    1 year ago

                    Yeah, I think he didn’t want to leave Libya in the mess it was in. That’s my assessment at a glance.