• imPastaSyndrome@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    152
    ·
    2 months ago

    Also I don’t quite get it. Who makes the money?

    Oh is this so they can work?

    Do they have to sign a contract where they will work for you or else they lose the house and counseling?

    I just don’t see how a society can continue if they aren’t paying their fair share!

    /SarcasticCapitalism

  • Sundial@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    77
    ·
    2 months ago

    Yes, but if we don’t have so many shitheads in the street how can we justify such bloated police budgets? I would rather spend the money on our fine boys and girls in blue then some people who actually need it.

    • PugJesus@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      45
      ·
      2 months ago

      Okay, but we have to be careful what part of the budget the money goes to. If we pay the cops too much, they might send their kids to college or some other liberal bullshit; and if we pay too much for training, we might accidentally get them competent instructors instead of grifters who promise them that killing people will make their pp hard. We have to make sure that we only buy military surplus that no police force could conceivably need, and paint it scawwy black, because military camo isn’t oppressive enough.

  • peopleproblems@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    50
    ·
    2 months ago

    It still blows my mind that some people cannot comprehend that not everything needs an exchange of currency in some way shape or form.

    “They don’t do anything in return?” “They don’t get worse!” “But who compensates the people who help them?” “We do.” “But then who compensates us?”

    • GoodEye8@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      2 months ago

      I view it as a form of capitalism indoctrination. If there’s no material compensation it’s a bad idea, which is the capitalist idea of “if I don’t make a profit I won’t do it”. I’ve seen people argue free energy is bad because the excess energy cannot be monetized, which is something you say only if you want to profit from energy.

    • Queen HawlSera@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      2 months ago

      Like do these people realize that if we give people the means to not just survive, but thrive, in our society which rapidly approaches post-scarcity (I’d argue we’d basically be there if we had better distribution of wealth) then they would have no reason to steal or kill? I mean except for the worst cases, but ya know… if everyone except for the truly evil has no reason or desire to do crime then…

      Just saying imagine a world where police actually fought bad guys and just let social workers handled the wayward sheep, the downtrodden, and the desperate?

  • Gerudo@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    45
    ·
    2 months ago

    Who knew getting them healthy and back in the workforce paying taxes could pay off?

  • Phoenicianpirate@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    42
    ·
    2 months ago

    Conservatives hate these not because they don’t work, but that they shouldn’t work. They insist that the only thing that matters is piety and hard work. If those aren’t enough, you just aren’t pious enough and aren’t working hard enough, even if the work literally crippled you that you cannot do as much of it as you did before.

    It is entirely about being cruel and evil as a policy.

    • Dragonstaff@leminal.space
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      2 months ago

      “Without the threat of being thrown out onto the street, my workers won’t put up with as much mistreatment.”

      If you have kids and aren’t rich, you literally can’t go into business for yourself in the US…if you fail that means your family becomes homeless and loses their health care.

      The cruelty and evil helps the rich control the rest of us.

    • jubilationtcornpone@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      The Gilded Age: A Tale of Today is a – rather long winded – story, co-authored by Mark Twain, about a family who inherits something like 80,000 acres of [worthless] land in east Tennessee. They spend years trying to scheme their way to wealth by selling the land, only to completely fail and ultimately lose it due to unpaid property taxes. The story is satire but it’s a sad one.

      It’s about poor people who imagine themselves to be rich people in waiting. If not for this one pesky little obstacle, which actually turns out to be a lifetime full of obstacles. Because the easist way to get rich is to be rich and the hardest way to get rich is to not be rich.

      On some level, this is how the average Republican sees themselves: a rich person in waiting. And they would finally get there if not for all those OTHER poor people who keep “stealing” all the “wealth”.

  • barsquid@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    30
    ·
    2 months ago

    Ok, but how can Finland afford the nesting-doll yachts if they are giving out money that should have gone into billionaires’ hoards?

    • umbraroze@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      2 months ago

      I can imagine nothing more miserable than having a day out on a massive expensive yacht… on the Baltic Sea.

      (Regular rich people might have some fun on the ferries, but billionaires probably don’t, because this involves buying a ticket and sharing the ship with the rabble.)

      One day, I wish I had a shitty old fishing boat and go slowly puttering through the rain and gloom. Living the real life.

  • BarqsHasBite@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    29
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    I really don’t think anyone can get physically healthier (I think that’s a big point) when they are sleeping in the cold and don’t have good nutrition. (Multivitamins ftw.)

          • Guy Dudeman@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            11
            ·
            edit-2
            2 months ago

            In my day, the women lusted after their lovers, whose genitals were like that of donkeys and whose emission were like horses. Ezekiel 23:20

            MY God commits war crimes on a massive scale:

            The earth will be shaken from its place at the wrath of the LORD of Hosts on the day of His burning anger. Like a hunted gazelle, like a sheep without a shepherd, each will return to his own people, each will flee to his native land.

            Whoever is caught will be stabbed, and whoever is captured will die by the sword.

            Their infants will be dashed to pieces before their eyes, their houses will be looted, and their wives will be ravished. Isaiah 13:13-16

            • tootoughtoremember@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              7
              ·
              2 months ago

              HBO needs to make an old testament series. I need a GoT budget thrown at the destruction of Sodom and Gomorrah, after at least half an hour of truely understanding their wickedness.

              • Guy Dudeman@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                8
                ·
                edit-2
                2 months ago

                The “wickedness” of Sodom is described as:

                Ezekiel 16:49–50: “This was the guilt of your sister Sodom: she and her daughters had pride, excess of food, and prosperous ease, but did not aid the poor and needy. They were haughty, and did abominable things before me; therefore I removed them when I saw it.”

                later prophetic reproaches of Sodom and Gomorrah do not condemn, implicate, or even mention homosexual conduct as the reason for the cities’ destruction: instead assigning the blame to other sins, such as adultery, dishonesty,[48] and uncharitableness.

                https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sodom_and_Gomorrah#The_sin_of_Sodom

                So… pretty much America?

                • peopleproblems@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  4
                  ·
                  2 months ago

                  Adultery, dishonesty and uncharitableness…

                  Yeah that explains my ex pretty well. I guess fire 'n brimstone is what we gonna get

      • PugJesus@lemmy.worldOP
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        2 months ago

        Thought it was just that they were useless for most healthy adults with any diet short of nutritional deficiency.

        • acosmichippo@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          edit-2
          2 months ago

          yes, that’s what we should be advocating for unhoused people, not wasting money on multivitamins. If we’re already talking about giving them an apartment and counseling, I don’t think a reasonable meal plan is much more to ask for. Especially if our aim is to get them back into a healthy lifestyle, healthy food should absolutely be part of that plan.

  • brbposting@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    25
    ·
    2 months ago

    The “4 out of 5” figure roughly matches what I recall being told by a head of Catholic Charities maybe a decade ago. You certainly have some percentage of people who’ve been given everything they need to be comfortable, and when you leave them alone and come back to check on them, they simply have not been able to look after themselves. But for the vast majority, it does work. People are in a safe space where they can look for work, have an address to put down on applications, and all that.

    Quite affordable too; ambulance rides and jail visits aren’t cheap.

  • RangerJosie@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    20
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    In the US the cruelty is the point. We will never end homelessness here because its an intended feature of our economic system. It’s a constant threat to workers. Coercing them into accepting low wages and long hours in the name of stability.

    • JaggedRobotPubes@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      2 months ago

      It should be treated as a union issue.

      “You don’t get to have the leverage of excommunication and death over our workers”

    • grue@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      “It’s called a reference, sweaty – look it up.”

      (Maybe, anyway.)

  • PunnyName@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    2 months ago

    Dishwashers are an accessibility item, too. Housing should be required to have them, just like places require wheelchair ramps.

    • Soup@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      2 months ago

      And if we have to pick in-unit laundry should be top priority. You can do a lot with a sink and a hot plate but ain’t nobody should be washing clothes by hand and having to keep an eye on your clothes, especially for unhoused people who are probably a little justified in being worried about leaving their stuff unattended, takes some energy people may not have.

      • Dasus@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        2 months ago

        Yeah here in Finland that is basically achieved by having a laundry-room in apartment buildings that you can reserve. In some of the places I lived, it did cost though, so more of a laundromat in the cellar of your building. But usually free in the buildings that have a lot of government supported people.

        • andxz@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          2 months ago

          Also Finnish, and where I live it’s not only free to do as much laundry as you want up to three hours/day down in the basement but everyone in the house helps to keep the washers and dryers clean and functional as well as regularly clean the common areas together. As a 38 year old man it’s quite funny to hang around and clean with a bunch of older ladies, lol.

          …and ofc that sweet unlimited internet for free is nice as well.

      • PunnyName@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        2 months ago

        Absolutely. I’m currently living in a shelter, and we have 3 washers and dryers, 1 of each has been busted for at least a week. The door locks, and only staff has the code. Sharing a laundry situation has barely any pros, and mostly cons.

  • kittenzrulz123
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    2 months ago

    Alternatively the government can spend an equal or greater amount to making homelessness illegal, making their lives as painful as possible, reducing every opportunity they have for upward mobility, and simultaneously reducing taxes for the capitalists.