Basically the title

    • nilloc@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      29
      ·
      2 months ago

      Browser too, and the whole activeX, and DirectX api system to practically force windows only development.

      • prole
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        2 months ago

        Yeah, same with gaming until Proton came along

        • Mactan@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          22
          ·
          2 months ago

          for the millionth time they get to stand on the shoulders on all the wine development that came before it. and now we have to reckon with the bullshit of proton patches that never go upstream to make wine better for all

          • prole
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            edit-2
            2 months ago

            for the millionth time

            Why are you mad at me? Have I ever even interacted with you before?

            Calm down.

          • IceFoxX@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            2 months ago

            Criticism may be justified, but without Proton, how far would wine have come? Without Steamdeck + proton, gaming would still be a no-go for linux and absolutely not worth mentioning. So fewer users would have switched to linux.

            OK let go back and bring wine forward … Maybe it will be something in 10-20 years ( well for released titles and not future Titels.)

          • Soluna
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            2 months ago

            Tbf if wine were released under regular GNU instead of LGPL, Valve wouldn’t have been able to make Proton proprietary, and so their contributions would also be open source. It is unfortunate that this is the situation, but by using the LGPL license WINE basically permitted this, no?

              • Soluna
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                4
                ·
                2 months ago

                Okay my bad, I think I just misunderstand BSD-3 and read somewhere that Proton is Valve’s proprietary software. In terms of open source software, the only licenses I’m really familiar with are GNU, Apache, and MIT. So I read one thing online saying Proton was proprietary and assumed BSD-3 was a proprietary license without looking into it further.

            • Mactan@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              2 months ago

              Coincidently one of the things they list (named pipes) as an improvement is something I’ve had a nuisance with for years. there’s multiple things that I would love wine to have that it does not but proton does