Quite a good list, although without any real surprises, except for the cheeky inclusion of a recent fan-made PC port. I’m glad Kerbal Space Program is on it, but a few other personal favorites (and candidates for best game of all time) are absent, like The Talos Principle, BeamNG.drive, NEO Scavenger, World of Goo, Mafia, Machinarium and Gothic II. Jets’n’Guns - a very early Indie masterpiece of a 2D space shooter - as well, but it’s a bit too obscure for these kinds of lists. I’ll stop here before I accidentally create my own top 100.

Are your favorite PC games well-represented by this list?

  • kittenzrulz123
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    How is Doom only in tenth place and the original Half-Life isn’t even close to top (edit: I just checked, Half-Life isn’t even on the list).

    • Vodulas [they/them]@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      2 months ago

      They set a rule that only one game from a series can be on the list. Half-Life 2 probably just beat 1 in the very subjective scoring.

    • Lojcs@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      On the other hand, how is doom even on the list? This isn’t a ‘most influential games’ list. Surely the 10th best game in 2024 isn’t Doom 1993? Their scoring system (Quality 60%, Importance 15%, Hotness 15%, Playability 10%) makes sense to me, but how they assign those scores is baffling.

      Take doom and doom eternal for example:
      Doom 1993: Q 8.41 - I 9.99 - H 6.81 - P 6.81
      Doom eternal: Q 8.00 - 7.45 - H 6.09 - P 8.45

      How is cardboard enemies, simplest damage mechanics, story made of 2 still pictures and exposition text, and single axis camera control higher quality than any modern shooter? And in what universe could a 30 year old game be called hot??