Hold on a sec, - just - hold up. You’re telling me, okay, the guy who can’t finish a thought at all, who lies all the time as a conversational style, who wears botched paint on his face with little raccoon cutouts for his beady, cloudy eyes, with his wet hair that goes to the middle of his back all whipped up like cotton candy, in a huge plastic girdle that makes him stand like the front-half of a centaur, with lifts in his shoes, and a high, whiny, grating voice with the jacking-off-two-giants-dance . . . .
You’re telling me he’s worse than the 2016 version? Cause all that’s the same.
he’s louder.
and smellier.
Nailed it
He’s eating the dogs
He’s eating the cats
He’s dripping the Syphilis from his tiny mushroom 🍄 peen
He’s emboldened by his Syphilis induced dementia
Removed by mod
Weird. I thought he was totally sane in 2016. Stop voting for this weirdo that wants to fuck his daughter. Yes, his crimes are horrible, but the worst part about him is that he is so annoying.
I thought he was totally sane in 2016
That’s because you didn’t know about him. He’s been pretty much a perv, crook and liar all his life.
I fully assumed dude was being sarcastic.
Nah, dawg. I’m bigly serious.
When I was a kid in the nineties, I had a book of urban legends. One of them was about a couple who happened to encounter him in a broken down car and help him out, only to find out he had later anonymously paid off their mortgage. It’s interesting sometimes to reflect on that story.
I think the real tipping point for me was the day he had a press conference and started looking up at the sky and shouting that he was the chosen one. It seemed like he genuinely believed it and seriously expected god to come down from the heavens to praise him.
Been saying for a couple of years that he went past a tipping point. Not sure when I noticed, 2021 or 2022? Not being funny, but I bet he won’t be able to speak in public sometime in the next 2 years.
There was a great article where experts analyzed his speech patterns and it was eye opening.
Found it!
(Crud. Can’t get past the paywall.)
Alas, nevermind. :(
I wanted to read it, so here’s the archived version. Thanks for sharing!deleted by creator
Let him drag the entire GOP to hell with him.
If you’re young…
Never, never, ever let Republicans forget this is who they are. If they try to claim less government or family values ever again, the response is Donald Trump.
Problem is he may take the USA down with him
Oh no.
Are you suggesting it’s not a big deal if the usa becomes a fascist country?
Hey, you know how last time it took America, the British Empire, and the Soviet Union to beat fascism?
More than it currently is or…? I’m suggesting that it is not a big deal if the USA does anything. Fascist, slightly less fascist; very few people care.
I feel like I’ve seen this headline (and slight variants) multiple times in the past few weeks. It’s almost a Gish Gallop statement, because where do you begin?
It implies that he had a grip 4/8 years ago.
It implies that he ever had a grip.
It implies that his public statements are weirder now than before, when they’ve always been bizarre.
It implies that Donald Trump’s policy positions are peculiar to him, when really he’s basically reflecting what Republicans have been trying to push on us for decades.
No, he’s never had a grip, but there’s been a noticeable change since even 2016. As there was a noticeable change to 16 from ten years prior. He’s just gradually declining. It means nothing for his base that they are voting for a Vance succession, apparently.
Just to be clear—I know it’s said that this is almost a gish gallop statement—but it absolutely is not.
Since we’re just talking about the headline and not the contents of the article, then this is just a statement. It’s not an argument so it can’t be a gish gallop. If we take the implications of the statement as premises and the headline as a conclusion, then this is just one singular argument which also means it cannot be a gish gallop. Any argument will have a number of premises. Where do you begin? At any of the premises. Demonstrating that the premises are false will show the conclusion to be false. By definition a gish gallop is a great number of arguments that overwhelm an opponent. One argument simply cannot be a gish gallop.
What, just now?
The news source of this post could not be identified. Please check the source yourself. Media Bias Fact Check | bot support
If you have nothing to add to the conversation then shut the fuck up. You’re annoying enough as is, but when you literally have no reason to post, then don’t fucking post!
Careful, the bot fanbois will come to tell you to block it and then your comment will be deleted anyway
Careful, the rage apologists will come along and defend screaming at computer code.
You really should just block it though?
It’s easy. It’s wild to me that people just leave this feature on the table.
Lol why are you so mad at media bias bot?
I’m just mad that they post even when they don’t have any contribution whatsoever.
Fuckin’ robots.
Because it’s biased propaganda masquerading as science.
Bad bot
deleted by creator
Yeah, probably not. When the Gipper lost his jellybeans, that was seen as a positive because he was easier to control/manipulate.
it is a good thing there are definitely not going to be any other assholes around him to help with it, then…
