• odium@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    80
    ·
    2 months ago

    How is the idea that two evils can fight each other so hard to understand? Not all fights are between a good and a evil.

    • RudeOnTuesdays@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      57
      ·
      2 months ago

      Seriously. There are also people on Lemmy that think anyone who has sympathy for civilians also support terrorists.

      How absolutely fucking brain-dead do you have to be to not understand that killing civilians is wrong? You can hate the rulers of Israel, Hamas, and Hezbollah while simultaneously hoping that Israeli, Palestinian, and Lebanese civilians don’t get hurt.

      This isn’t rocket science.

    • Fox@pawb.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      31
      ·
      2 months ago

      It doesn’t help that they have the emotional maturity of toddlers

    • AItoothbrush@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      21
      ·
      2 months ago

      Yeah and they also forget that something evil can have elements or components that arent evil. You wont kill every employee of a company because the ceo is evil. You wont kill every palestanian or israeli because the IDF and hamas are terrorist organizations.

    • mindbleach@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      18
      ·
      2 months ago

      Reality is a team sport, to some people. The conservative worldview is defined by interpersonal loyalty. There is some rightful order to things, and it’s your job to justify and promote that, by stringing together argument-shaped sentences. They think that’s all anyone’s doing.

      And yes, I would call tankies conservatives. The word doesn’t refer to right-wing policies. It means “well somebody’s gotta be king.” They use leftist language, and absorb some leftist motivation, but any of it and all of it will go out the window for the social game of maintaining loyalty.

    • barsquid@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      2 months ago

      I think it is difficult for children to understand nuance like that. Aren’t cartoons always very obvious about who is in the right?

    • Linkerbaan@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      2 months ago

      Your statement is akin to saying the Allies in WW2 were no heroes. In fact they were also the bad guys because they were racist and homophobic. Thus WW2 was a “complex and nuanced” issue.

    • Possibly linux@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      2 months ago

      It is fights between arbitrary stance with no factual evidence and arbitrary stance with no factual evidence.

      Actually it sounds a lot like a holly war

  • barsquid@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    68
    ·
    2 months ago

    “America bad therefore all adversaries are good and all adversaries’ actions are good.”

    • Linkerbaan@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      Is resistance to Genocide good? No this is a nuanced complex issue and anyone saying it’s not is an America hater! (Because israel = America right?)

      • barsquid@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        19
        ·
        2 months ago

        Resistance to genocide is the only moral position. That’s why it is so repugnant that you want more genocide in Gaza, more killing in Ukraine, and pogroms in Ohio.

        • Linkerbaan@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          edit-2
          2 months ago

          Resistance to genocide is the only moral position.

          Because endorsing Genocide and voting for it is ‘resisting it’. 8K projector in full force.

          • barsquid@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            10
            ·
            2 months ago

            I hit a nerve, clearly. I’m not sorry that we are opposed to your MAGA agenda starting pogroms in Ohio. Wish you would get some therapy for whatever it is that makes you support that.

      • stoly@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        2 months ago

        Man I tell you. I often like your posts but sometimes your comments are just too much.

  • MehBlah@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    2 months ago

    I was blocking most lammy.ml communities I encountered. I finally just blocked all the lammy.ml instances. Its mostly trash there and I will find some place else.

  • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    2 months ago

    You got banned, logged into an alt, said the same thing, got banned again…

    And you were so surprised you had to make a post about it?

    • index@sh.itjust.worksOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      2 months ago

      No idea who they are, we got banned at the same time. You can see the conversation in the original post

    • YeetPics@mander.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      2 months ago

      You read a post title, clicked the link and scrolled ALLLLLL the way down to comment this?

      And you’re here trying to shame this other person for talking about getting banned?

      Lmao, typical tankie with the .world sock puppet account.

  • Linkerbaan@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    Based. Get wrecked Zionist troll.

    https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pinkwashing_(LGBT)

    Origin of the term

    In April 2010, Queers Undermining Israeli Terrorism (QUIT) in the Bay Area, used the phrase pinkwashing as a twist on greenwashing, a practice where companies claim to be eco-friendly in order to make profit. Dunya Alwan was at a talk with Ali Abunimah, editor of Electronic Intifada in 2010, when he said “We won’t put up with Israel whitewashing or greenwashing” and she thought “or pinkwashing!”

    In 2011, Sarah Schulman used the term pinkwashing in a widely read The New York Times editorial arguing that Israel used the tactic in its public relations. Schulman saw pinkwashing as a manifestation of homonationalism, the processes by which some powers selectively agree with the claims of sexual minorities and exploit them to justify racism, xenophobia (rejection of foreign people), and aporophobia (rejection of the poor);

    • NIB@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      20
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      Just because Israel is using this for propaganda, doesnt mean that it isnt true(or important). The USSR used american racism against black people for propaganda but that doesnt mean that there was no racism in the US or that racism wasnt important(or relevant to the discussion between 2 global powers).

      When someone tells you “gay people should be killed”, i think it is relevant to the discussion you have about that person.

        • Valmond@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          10
          ·
          2 months ago

          IDK, hes marked down as the gEnOcIdE/Maga guy (Connect is great for that :-).

          Quite annoying anyway, maga or not.

        • Eldritch@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          edit-2
          2 months ago

          Probably in relation to the blue maga name calling. Many of the low intelligence or high self radicalization people rely on as a crutch. Any time someone points out the vitriolic and illogical parts of their rhetoric. Ole Linky seems to be banned from most the communities I visit. Or at least don’t post there anymore. Kinda had forgotten about them honestly. But linky was definitely the one to say things like that.

    • Possibly linux@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      Thanks for the definition. So basically they got banned for “pretending” to support LGBQ? That’s definitely interesting coming from a tankie.

      Also, why are you posting to world news@Lemmy.ml? I think we have established that it is not a good community

      • Linkerbaan@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        2 months ago

        Because Lemmy.World news communities are ran by Zionists which ban users for criticizing israel.

    • redfellow@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      2 months ago

      You didn’t politely disagree. He asked a direct question to which you earlier said to know the answer to.

      What you kept repeating was not an answer to said question, and then you started playing stupid games against someone who’s shown time again to have no patience for them.

      • sandbox@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        2 months ago

        Imagine you are an expert in software engineering, and imagine I asked you, “How do you build an app?” How would you directly answer that question?

        Moreover, if it was obvious to you that the person wasn’t really interested in how to build apps, but they actually doubt it’s possible to build apps at all and they just want to waste your time arguing with you would never get your app approved on the App Store or something like that, how much detail would you be willing to go into about how to build apps? Would you take them through the whole process, start to finish? Would you point them towards resources they could use to learn how to build an app?

        I answered the question quite extensively, with explanations and caveats. It should be very clear that while he (and you) may disagree with me, I am not making these arguments in bad faith, I’m not trolling, and I’m not being particularly rude or breaking any rules.

        I’m definitely not playing any “games”, I’m just explaining my position the best way I can, but I’m also not trying to waste my time arguing with people who have zero genuine interest in taking what I say seriously.

    • StupidBrotherInLaw@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      2 months ago

      That’s about right for flyingsquid. Seems like a nice bloke but has repeatedly shown he doesn’t have the impartiality required to be a moderator.

      • Crashumbc@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        2 months ago

        I don’t think he is nice, I think he acts like a mall cop on an ego trip. I had to block him

        • FundMECFSResearch
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          edit-2
          2 months ago

          He’s nice when you agree and most his opinions are decent so you tend to agree a lot. But he tends to start acting weird/hostile when you have a disagreement.

          I really appreciate his contributions to lemmy while thinking maybe he isn’t the best person to moderate a political community.

          • Crashumbc@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            2 months ago

            We have different opinions on what nice is. Personally I feel if someone’s only nice when you agree with them. That’s not nice

      • sandbox@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        2 months ago

        It was a message I accidentally submitted before I had finished writing, then deleted so that I could continue to write it, but by the time I finished it, I was already banned. It was something along the lines of “I don’t really think you’re arguing in good faith here, because as you said, you “knew” before even starting this conversation that I wouldn’t have any practical ideas”, or something along those lines. If there’s any way to un-delete it I’d be happy to do that, if you know how I can? Or somehow recover the original text?

        Edit: Never mind, figured out how to undelete it. Original comment is restored. I accidentally submitted just that fragment instead of a longer message I had intended on replying with.

  • Dasus@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    2 months ago

    Well one of the mods over there is a clearly pro-Russian account.

    I’ve been banned from that community (and all others on Lemmy.ml he is a mod on) several times by this account: davel@lemmy.ml

    https://reddit.moonbeam.town/u/davel@lemmy.ml

    https://lemmygrad.ml/u/davel

    He absolutely refuses to answer the question “are you pro-Russian” while fiercely touting Russian propaganda, saying Russian propaganda doesn’t exist at all, denying Uighur genocide, advocating against Ukraine, all that jazz.

    Ten bucks says he comes here whining about stalking again while refusing to answer if he supports Putler or not.

    • index@sh.itjust.worksOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      No doubt there’s russia government propaganda out there but advocating against the ukrainian authoritarian government is not automatically “enemy” propaganda

      • Dasus@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        2 months ago

        Advocating against Ukraine in the context of the Russo-Ukrainian war, by spreading pretty much verbatim what Russian state news is touting.