• katy ✨
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    They’d still be restricted to the Webkit rendering engine though, right?

    • Aasikki@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      19
      ·
      1 year ago

      If you can sideload anything you want, why would that be the case? I don’t think there’s a technical limitation, they just don’t allow it on the app store if it doesn’t use safari.

      • katy ✨
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        1 year ago

        Oh that’s true, I always thought iOS just didn’t have that capability at all but that makes sense that it would just be blocked at the App Store level.

    • jmcs@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 year ago

      If you can sideload an app there’s nothing Apple can do to stop you from shipping a new rendering engine.

      • realharo@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        They can still prevent the JIT from working because the resulting native code would not be signed. That would result in worse JavaScript performance in such browsers, but considering today’s hardware and software optimizations, it may not matter that much in practice.

        • maynarkh@feddit.nl
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          1 year ago

          Yes, but the point of the law is that apps that you install that are not from the official store actually have to work. It even has clauses so that installing stuff from different sources than Apple can’t intentionally be a worse experience than the official app IIRC. That might be just for messaging though.