I’m not convinced that hydrogen (green or otherwise) makes sense for powering transportation. I think it’s best use case is in replacing fossil fuels in high-temperature industrial processes.

  • Ellia Plissken@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    2 months ago

    it’s the least efficient method we currently have of storing electricity. and it’s only zero emission if you use a fuel cell

    • Mihies@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      2 months ago

      But theoretically the storage can scale well and it’s relatively cheap, albeit who really knows about the price for storage since there are no at scale storages out there yet.

      it’s only zero emission if you use a fuel cell

      What do you mean by this? However you burn it, it’s zero emission, isn’t it?

    • Hubi@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      2 months ago

      The single advantage hydrogen has over batteries is that the “refueling” is pretty much instantaneous. If charging infrastructure and technology improves, there will be no reason to bother with it anymore.

      • zurohki@aussie.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        2 months ago

        IIRC, pumping hydrogen is only fast if the pump has a substantial rest between vehicles. Get a line of FCEVs wanting filled and you’re looking at filling times not much faster than charging a battery EV.

        • vzq
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          2 months ago

          deleted by creator

          • Kecessa@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            2 months ago

            From what I understand it’s transported in liquid form over long distances (across the ocean for example) but then it’s transported/stores in gaseous form.