WASHINGTON — A new study suggests that your morning brew might be doing more than just perking you up — it could be protecting you from a range of serious heart conditions. Researchers working with the Endocrine Society have found that drinking a moderate amount of coffee is associated with a lower risk of developing multiple cardiometabolic diseases. In simpler terms, your daily cup of coffee (or three) might help ward off conditions like Type 2 diabetes, heart disease, and stroke.

“Consuming three cups of coffee, or 200-300 mg caffeine, per day might help to reduce the risk of developing cardiometabolic multimorbidity in individuals without any cardiometabolic disease,” says Dr. Chaofu Ke, the lead author of the study from Suzhou Medical College in China, in a media release.

Source: https://studyfinds.org/3-cups-of-coffee-diseases/

  • celsiustimeline@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    3 hours ago

    They’ve been saying coffee prevents heart disease for decades. Why do they keep putting studies out that make it seem like this is a new discovery?

  • Underwaterbob@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    5 hours ago

    Caffeine gives me brain-destroying headaches if I just drink a single cup a day for a month or two. Inevitably. I’ve tried to be a coffee drinker a half-dozen times in the past few years because I love the pep I get from caffeine, and every single time, eventually I end up slowly pacing in a dark, quiet room - because even sitting down makes the pain unbearable - wishing the world would end so my head would stop throbbing.

    I guess I just wasn’t drinking enough?

  • TheDeadHorse@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    6 hours ago

    I wonder if some of the positive affect is due to the temporary increase of blood pressure which may flex the walls of the veins and so forth.

  • Billegh@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    1 day ago

    I look forward to a solution to whatever disease causes people to try and talk to me before I’ve had my coffee.

  • MonkderVierte@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    25
    ·
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    than just perking you up

    It doesn’t, if you’re a regular drinker. Rather, you get withdrawal symptoms at morning.

    • AA5B@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      1 day ago

      Then you get mornings like today. Do I feel like shit because of withdrawal symptoms, or do I feel like shit from lack of sleep

  • Blackout@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    24
    ·
    1 day ago

    I drink coffee but I put no faith in this reports that always seem to go one way or another. Just drink it in moderation. It wasn’t that long ago a glass of wine a day was considered healthy too.

        • booly@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          15 hours ago

          More specifically, the more recent studies analyze non-drinkers in two categories: those who just choose not to drink (generally healthier than even light drinkers), and those who don’t drink because they have serious health conditions incompatible with drinking or people recovering from substance/alcohol abuse issues who (generally much less healthy than light drinkers). By separating those who don’t drink versus those who can’t drink, the studies reverse earlier findings that non-drinkers are less healthy than light drinkers.

      • Blackout@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        1 day ago

        No, alcohol has always been toxic. just like tobacco. Might see the same restrictions on their ads in the future.

      • drphungky@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        edit-2
        1 day ago

        The issue is a lot of teetotalers don’t drink anything because of their existing health conditions, really bad obesity, hypertension, liver problems, etc. So those that don’t drink at all are actually less healthy than the average population, and those that drink in moderation are obviously healthier than those who drink a lot. So the results look like moderate drinking is the most healthy but there’s an (or a lot of) omitted variable bias.

      • VeganPizza69 Ⓥ@lemmy.vg
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        6 hours ago

        It’s not. Just eat the grapes or grape leaves. Stop trying to make the J curve happen, there is no safe minimum dose of alcohol.

        • Smoogs@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          3 hours ago

          Because I personally don’t want to eat 80 grapes. Besides the sugar content of 80 grapes is not healthy. If the alcohol content bothers you just get the non alcoholic wine or even seek out blueberry wine in which you require less for some of the same benefits or don’t. No one is forcing you to drink it. maybe go to alanon and get some management over your emotions around alcohol.

  • Chozo@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    47
    ·
    2 days ago

    Coffee, wine, chocolate… it feels like every day there’s a new study showing how they’re either great for you or how they’re giving you cancer.

    • Maggoty@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      6 hours ago

      I can tell you right now chocolate has a positive effect. My brain just zonks out sometimes. Like I can’t do 2+2. But chocolate jump starts it right back into normal. I’m not going to sit here and say it’s a miracle food you can eat all day with no downsides but it definitely does something positive.

      • Charapaso@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        5 hours ago

        Have you tried seeing if any sugary snack give you the same effect? Sounds like the effects of a dip in blood sugar.

    • Akrenion@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      18
      ·
      1 day ago

      Most of these do not account for socioeconomic status of the test subjects or people willfully ignore them for a better narrative in derivative articles. They therefore boil down to: “people who can afford nice things live longer” Which would not be a great headline.

    • RBG@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      26
      ·
      2 days ago

      Why not both? They might be all true. It is totally possible something reduces your chance to get diabetes but increases your chance for liver cancer.

    • mox@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      1 day ago

      Much like the way we were told for ages that a glass of wine every day was good for our health. I think the latest research is showing no evidence of that, but rather that any amount of alcohol raises the risk of cancer.

      • Zorque@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        15
        ·
        edit-2
        1 day ago

        People who drink moderate amounts of wine regularly tend to have higher income, and thus better health in general. At least that’s the last generally accepting hypothesis I last saw.

        • Blueshift@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          12
          ·
          edit-2
          1 day ago

          A problem with the older studies that seemed to indicate that alcohol had health benefits was also that their control group, the people who didn’t drink, turned out largely not to do so because they already had severe medical problems. They weren’t allowed to drink because of them.

          Compared to them it looked like the people who did drink were more healthy on average. So they concluded there must be health benefits to drinking alcohol.

          This “Science VS” episode is about that (and has a bunch of citations in its transcript): https://gimletmedia.com/shows/science-vs/llhdgj

          • frezik@midwest.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            1 day ago

            The era of that was also the first time these studies were being done predominantly with non-smokers. It was hard to disentangle the health effects of smoking with everything else. Smoking rates drop through the 80s and 90s, and wine and coffee suddenly look pretty good compared to how bad we thought they were.

  • Repple (she/her)@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    59
    ·
    2 days ago

    I choose to believe all the studies that say coffee is healthy and none that say it is not. I won’t change my coffee drinking habits regardless, so best think positively?

      • FundMECFSResearch
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        5 hours ago

        This reminds me the other month I was reading studies in a dodgy medical journal and one said it “disproved” wheat allergy. When I looked in the funding section, well you had a lot of bread companies.

  • Eggyhead@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    22
    ·
    1 day ago

    It’s also linked to me having an anxiety attack before the day is done. Talking from experience.

  • Showroom7561@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    1 day ago

    Considering that coffee is probably the highest source of antioxidants in a person’s diet, there will be some health benefits. Just dont add dairy milk to it, or it will blunt absorption. Soy milk is fine.

    But if you’re an overweight, overworked, stress filled couch potato who doesn’t exercise and eats poorly, then you’re health is screwed regardless of how much coffee you drink 😂

    • angrystego@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 day ago

      I didn’t really understand the abstract, I’m affraid. Is CGA the same thing as chlorigenic acid and is that the antioxidant you’re talking about? Also, did they test coffee with a little milk? The abstract makes it sound like they tested coffee without milk and coffee made entirely of milk, which doesn’t happen in real life. I am confused.

      • Showroom7561@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 day ago

        It’s one study of many showing this effect. I believe they suggest that the protein in milk is the culprit. The same effect applies to tea… Adding dairy to tea reduces its health benefits.

        • angrystego@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          1 day ago

          I do get that, I was interested in the amount of milk and the name of the healthy things it blocks from being absorbed - there might be more than one, right?

          • Showroom7561@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            21 hours ago

            You’d need to explore the topic in further detail, as I’m sure the answer is there.

            It may be dose dependent, but it may also be that a “splash” of milk might not impair absorption by much, but would anyone use just a splash of milk?