• kittenzrulz123
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    No it makes sense, this post mentions the corruption of the legal system and how wage labor results in the capitalist class having all the power while producing none of the labor. How is that in any way linked with authoritarianism or military action?

    • finitebanjo@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      The part where authoritarians claims to oppose capitalism. There are bad actors who claim the opposite of the outcome of their actions. Thats the nuance of this situation.

      • kittenzrulz123
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        2 months ago

        Still seems strange to comment here, I mean thats a valid argument but this doesn’t seem like the right place.

              • kittenzrulz123
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                2 months ago

                Yeah that doesn’t mean every slightly left wing post is authoritarian, that just comes off as far too accusatory. Shocking news, actual leftists exist on this instance.

                • finitebanjo@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  2 months ago

                  I never said the post was improper, I just said be careful and then asked a question that sorts the wheat from the chaff.

                  • kittenzrulz123
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    2
                    ·
                    2 months ago

                    A better question would be do the workers need a vanguard/vanguard party and if so how much power should they hold. Meanwhile opposing Nato is universal for pacifists.