• macniel@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    2 months ago

    Yeah I don’t understand why they don’t have a codeberg or similar that they host themselves.

    • Tja@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      2 months ago

      How would that help? If you release something as GPL code, you cannot prevent it from being used to train a model, no matter where it’s hosted.

      • null@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        2 months ago

        There’s a difference between handing something to someone and leaving it somewhere they happen to be able to take it from.

      • kittenzrulz123
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        Im personally waiting for a massive lawsuit, legally companies cannot train AI on GPL code (at least I don’t believe so)

        • Tja@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          2 months ago

          There’s nothing in GPL that would forbid it. Only distribution without code publication is forbidden.

          • macniel@feddit.org
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            2 months ago

            mhm, and how would the distribution inside an LLM work? Are those code snippets CoPilot et al produce come with dedicated license sections?

            And regarding how it would help selfhosting the code: it wouldn’t be on the GITHub servers owned by Microsoft, which owns/operates CoPilot. Its akin to feeding the LLM directly by pushing it to their servers.

          • kittenzrulz123
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            2 months ago

            If Al warned about that it would be legal, I don’t believe any AI requires GPL