• Tja@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    2 months ago

    How would that help? If you release something as GPL code, you cannot prevent it from being used to train a model, no matter where it’s hosted.

    • null@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      2 months ago

      There’s a difference between handing something to someone and leaving it somewhere they happen to be able to take it from.

    • kittenzrulz123
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      Im personally waiting for a massive lawsuit, legally companies cannot train AI on GPL code (at least I don’t believe so)

      • Tja@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        2 months ago

        There’s nothing in GPL that would forbid it. Only distribution without code publication is forbidden.

        • macniel@feddit.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          2 months ago

          mhm, and how would the distribution inside an LLM work? Are those code snippets CoPilot et al produce come with dedicated license sections?

          And regarding how it would help selfhosting the code: it wouldn’t be on the GITHub servers owned by Microsoft, which owns/operates CoPilot. Its akin to feeding the LLM directly by pushing it to their servers.

        • kittenzrulz123
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 months ago

          If Al warned about that it would be legal, I don’t believe any AI requires GPL