• CosmicTurtle0@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    28
    ·
    2 months ago

    Technically the ruling was for crimes official acts he committed while in office.

    He’s no longer president and holds no privilege, except being the Republican nominatee for President. Which apparently is a protected class.

    • samus12345@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      Correct. Regardless, it has been codified that he IS above the law in some cases. Slippery slope is not a fallacy in this instance.

    • KillingTimeItself@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 months ago

      even as a president, this wouldn’t be protected under the immunity act, only presidential actions. Speaking to the public, as far as i am concerned is not considered to be a core “presidential action” in the government.