• anton
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      2 months ago

      But there can be less of it, if it is exercised by a monopoly.

      • jwiggler@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        13
        ·
        2 months ago

        Nah, it just institutionalizes it and perpetuates it in a different form – namely structural violence. It’s oppressive and coercive in nature, ultimately used to protect the interests of those with property and further instantiate inequality.

        You can’t eliminate violence through violence. You have to meet people’s basic needs. A society that coerces people to act a particular way – especially in regards to meeting their basic needs – through the threat of force could not have been built on freedom, or compassion, or mutual solidarity. It’s unjust, imo