Israel carried out its operation against Hezbollah on Tuesday by hiding explosive material within a new batch of Taiwanese-made pagers imported into Lebanon, according to American and other officials briefed on the operation.

The pagers, which Hezbollah had ordered from Gold Apollo in Taiwan, had been tampered with before they reached Lebanon, according to some of the officials. Most were the company’s AP924 model, though three other Gold Apollo models were also included in the shipment.

The explosive material, as little as one to two ounces, was implanted next to the battery in each pager, two of the officials said. A switch was also embedded that could be triggered remotely to detonate the explosives.

MBFC
Archive

  • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    203
    ·
    3 months ago

    So…

    They’re just casually admitting to another war crime?

    Against someone I don’t even think they’re officially at war against?

    • WhatAmLemmy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      116
      ·
      3 months ago

      When there are zero consequences for war crimes, the “rules based” law and order we virtue signal is completely meaningless.

    • pandapoo@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      27
      ·
      edit-2
      3 months ago

      Not that Israel needs an excuse to commit a war crimes on any day that ends in Y, but I don’t believe this is a violation of the Geneva convention.

      It was a mass targeted assassination campaign against an opposition military force structure. I’m not saying it’s not a crime, just that I don’t believe it’s a war crime.

      But I’m open to the very real possibility that I am wrong about that. So if I am, can you point me to the article(s) it’s in violation of?

      I genuinely would like to fill that gap in my knowledge, if it exists.

        • pandapoo@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          39
          ·
          edit-2
          3 months ago

          Those are rooted in actions like bombardments of civilian areas e.g. Dresden, Gaza, etc.

          Just because an action has collateral damage, does not make it indiscriminate.

          Again, it’s not like Israel isn’t already committing war crimes every day, I’m just not clear if this is one of them.

          For example, when the Ukrainian’s assassinated the propagandist in St Petersburg at the cafe, there was collateral damage. Still doesn’t make it a war crime.

          I am not comparing the morality of Ukraine to israel, I’m just giving you relevant example from recent history

          • NoneOfUrBusiness@fedia.io
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            15
            ·
            3 months ago

            Just because an action has collateral damage, does not make it indiscriminate.

            It’s definitely indiscriminate. They chose to use explosives that will cause large amounts of collateral damage. Even if the idea itself is fine, the 2750 injuries are 100% on them.

            • AHemlocksLie@lemmy.zip
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              17
              ·
              3 months ago

              I haven’t seen reports of significant collateral damage. I’m sure there was at least some, but that’s different from large amounts of collateral damage. To be considered indiscriminate, I think it would need to have either used larger charges with a bigger blast radius or distribute the pagers more widely in the hopes that Hezbollah agents got them along with the public. From my understanding, which may be flawed, neither of those conditions are true, so while there almost certainly was collateral damage, I don’t currently think it was widespread enough to consider the attack indiscriminate. If you have a source to contradict me, I’m open to reading it.

              Fuck Israel’s rampant genocidal war crimes, but I don’t think this counts as one.

              • NoneOfUrBusiness@fedia.io
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                6
                ·
                3 months ago

                Admittedly I can’t find the civilian injury numbers (I don’t think they’re out yet), but I found this:

                “Even if the attacks seem to have been targeted, they had heavy, indiscriminate collateral damages among civilians, including children among the victims,” EU foreign policy chief Josep Borrell said in a statement Wednesday after he met with Lebanese Foreign Minister Abdallah Bou Habib for talks.

                At least, they were indiscriminate enough that the EU foreign policy chief found it appropriate to call them indiscriminate, which makes sense given that they were at least strong enough to kill or injure the guy sitting next to you on the bus if you’re carrying a pager.

                Also from here:

                Hezbollah has vowed to retaliate against Israel. The group said two of its fighters were among the dead and threatened a “just punishment”.

                Given that 12 have died so far (9 at the time of the article), I’d expect more than 2 to be Hezbollah fighters before I call the attack discriminate. Now while there is a chance they’re more discriminate than this information implies, I doubt they got enough Hezbollah combatants or combat-adjacent members to qualify as valid military action.

                • AHemlocksLie@lemmy.zip
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  6
                  ·
                  3 months ago

                  Hmmm you may be right. We’ll have to see how the numbers shake out to be sure either way, but I’ll concede it at least sounds plausible the collateral damage is unacceptably high.

            • yetAnotherUser@discuss.tchncs.de
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              5
              ·
              3 months ago

              Large collateral damage is a percentage.

              An attack that targets and harms mostly combatants with little collateral damage is not indiscriminate. I’m curious what the ratio of combatants to noncombatants is before arguing whether this attack was a war crime.

      • Fedizen@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        3 months ago

        pagers are small enough that its likely a number of people were injured by pagers that had like fallen out of somebody’s pocket.

    • Icalasari@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      25
      ·
      3 months ago

      I swear it’s got to be to drag the middle east into a massive war to maybe trigger some sort of clause that forces the US to go to war for Israel or end up with massive penalties. It’s the only thing that makes sense that isn’t just, “For the Evilulz”

      And I swear to fuck if the US was actually stupid enough to enter a deal that forces them to go to war and send troops if the entire Middle East turns on Israel…

      • T00l_shed@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        3 months ago

        I mean, bibi seems to have the US by the short and curlies. I have no doubt that if things got spicy enough the US would gladly send boots on the ground to die for Israel’s actions. I could even imagine bibi saying “oh we’re so hurt, you guys do this, and we will stay back to defend our territory” while some poor schmuck from winsconsin gets exploded by an ied.

    • azertyfun@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      3 months ago

      I’m as critical of Israel as any reasonable person but that’s like the one thing they did recently that was actually a (at least somewhat) targeted attack against their enemies.

      Calling that a war crime unnecessarily and dangerously dilutes the term. Leveling cities and starving the fleeing population is a war crime and a crime against humanity. Intentionally shooting civilians, children, aid workers, and journalists is a war crime. How about we focus on those, it’s not like there’s a shortage of israeli war crimes to report on.

      EDIT: Apparently Lebanon reports 2800 injured and 12 dead from these attacks… How many fucking explosive pagers were involved? I doubt a significant percentage of those were Hezbollah, which would make that a war crime. The callous inefficiency of IDF operations will never cease to amaze me.

      • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        3 months ago

        Why would you think only valid military targets were next to these?

        Why are you still believing the IDFs first reports when the vast majority of the time they’re lying?

        • azertyfun@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          3 months ago

          Why would you think only valid military targets were next to these?

          That’s… not a war crime is. I don’t want to be the guy who justifies the death of civilians, because each one is a tragedy, but unfortunately in war there is such a thing as greater evils.

          Why are you still believing the IDFs first reports when the vast majority of the time they’re lying?

          Now that’s fair. And of course we can as well point out that their whole war is self-inflicted to start with so there’s not much legitimacy to any of their acts of war, even the less illegal ones.

          • Keeponstalin@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            7
            ·
            edit-2
            3 months ago

            This is terrorism and a violation of International humanitarian law. It’s not a war crime because Lebanon and Israel are not at war, yet Israel just attacked civilians in public, including health workers, and even officials in Parliament. Lebanese civilians are people like anyone else, yet this isn’t treated like the mass terrorist attack it is in most Western Media.

            Thousands of pagers simultaneously exploded across Lebanon and parts of Syria on September 17, 2024, resulting in at least 12 deaths, including at least two children and two health workers, and at least 2,800 injuries, according to Lebanon’s Ministry of Health.

            Photographs and videos filmed by victims and witnesses to the incident and reviewed by Human Rights Watch showed pagers exploding in various locales, such as grocery stores. Other videos that appear to be linked to the incident show adults and children in emergency rooms with severe penetrating traumatic injuries to their heads, torsos. and limbs, and other injuries consistent with the detonation of high explosives.

            Hezbollah, in a statement, said that the pagers belonged “to employees of various Hezbollah units and institutions” and blamed the Israeli government. US and former Israeli officials speaking to the media said that Israel was responsible for the attack. The Israeli military has not commented.

            “Customary international humanitarian law prohibits the use of booby traps – objects that civilians are likely to be attracted to or are associated with normal civilian daily use – precisely to avoid putting civilians at grave risk and produce the devastating scenes that continue to unfold across Lebanon today. The use of an explosive device whose exact location could not be reliably known would be unlawfully indiscriminate, using a means of attack that could not be directed at a specific military target and as a result would strike military targets and civilians without distinction. A prompt and impartial investigation into the attacks should be urgently conducted.”

            • Lama Fakih, Middle East and North Africa Director at Human Rights Watch
            • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              3 months ago

              It’s not a war crime because Lebanon and Israel are not at war,

              Their defense minister literally just said it was a war…

              Speaking to Israeli troops on Wednesday, Israeli Defense Minister Yoav Gallant said, “We are at the start of a new phase in the war — it requires courage, determination and perseverance.” He made no mention of the exploding devices but praised the work of Israel’s army and security agencies, saying “the results are very impressive.”

              https://apnews.com/article/lebanon-israel-exploding-pagers-hezbollah-syria-ce6af3c2e6de0a0dddfae48634278288

              They’re desperately trying to start wars to drag the US in while Biden is still in office.

              If an all out war happens, there is 100% chance Biden dives into it.

              Kamala there’s a slight chance she does the right thing, and trump’s price to go against Russia’s allies will be ridiculously high.

              So they want Biden to be the one to react.

    • They’re just casually admitting to another war crime?"

      From the article,

      according to American and other officials briefed on the operation.

      So in other words, they’re denying it officially. Just as they deny possessing nuclear arms.

      Against someone I don’t even think they’re officially at war against?

      Do they recognize Hezbollah as a country? Can’t officially be at war with someone you don’t recognize - those are just termed “police actions.” An oxymoron if I’ve ever heard one.

  • TheObviousSolution@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    87
    ·
    edit-2
    3 months ago

    You could tell Israel did it by the wanton disregard of civilian casualties and the lack of a global governmental backlash against the act.

    What I’m surprised is that were able to get them to believe the propaganda that pagers would be a much more secure communication medium.

    • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      29
      ·
      3 months ago

      The articles keep repeating “Hezbollah”, but the target of the attack appears to have been the Iranian ambassador to Lebanon.

      Much like the US bombing of an Iraqi airfield to kill the Iranian diplomatic delegation to Baghdad, this appears to be an entirely illegal and recklessly deployed assassination plot aimed at one guy. The thousands of injuries and the eight dead (at least two being children under the age of 11) are just collateral damage the IDF has once again blanket-tagged as “Evil Muslim Militants”.

      • TheObviousSolution@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        3 months ago

        That article doesn’t really indicate that one person was the target, nor does making 3000 pagers or whatever they were into bombs. I find it more likely that the Iranian delegation representative was just meeting with Hezbollah at the time or received one of their pagers to stay in communication. Nothing in the articles you link suggests this was done just to target them, just that they were affected.

      • capital@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        3 months ago

        They might be in regards to emanation.

        It’s funny how confident comments like these are without really thinking it though.

        • TimeSquirrel@kbin.melroy.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          3 months ago

          Go ahead, explain yourself then, since you seem to think I’m some sort of idiot. Because I have actually done this. And no vague psuedointellectual nonsense, technical details please. Frequencies, protocols, software, that sort of thing. Let’s hear your experience in the field.

          • capital@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            edit-2
            3 months ago

            My brother in christ, you are still missing the point.

            So you pick up a message that reads “867-5309” and the receiver picks up their landline and calls.

            So you have a phone number now. One that you probably already had given the organization we’re talking about. If the call is staying landline and within the boundaries of their country, you aren’t picking up shit with your SDR. You need to have a physical tap somewhere.

            They swapped cell phones which send and receive for pagers that receive only. Think for 2 seconds what that means for tracking. To say nothing of also losing the fucking microphone, camera, GPS…

            There’s a reason pagers are allowed into SCIFs where phones and other devices which send are not.

            There’s more to security than your experience picking up unencrypted shit with an SDR.

            • TimeSquirrel@kbin.melroy.org
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              3 months ago

              I appreciate your explanation. Thank you. The point was, I’d have liked to see a comment like that from the start instead of the snarkiness. I tend to get irritated when people just insult each other going “nuh-uh” without any substance. Nobody learns shit that way. If somebody is wrong, just correct them.

              • capital@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                3 months ago

                I brought up emanations in my first reply…

                I even couched it with a “might be” because I’m aware there’s lots I don’t know.

                It wasn’t that you may be wrong. It was your overconfidence and hyper-fixation on one type of security.

              • Bennettiquette@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                3 months ago

                with all respect, i think if you reread the original comment you might find it reads in a less vindictive tone than you originally read it in. text can be notoriously bad at conveying the difference between a generalized chuckle and a targeted insult, especially when the reader has experience or passion in the topic.

  • Sundial@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    86
    ·
    edit-2
    3 months ago

    This is Israel’s version of de-escalating an escalating conflict. Disgusting animals.

    • ironhydroxide@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      3 months ago

      Israel has a lot of computer knowledge. Maybe they think that it’s like a value in computer memory. Keep adding to it and eventually it’ll be zero again. (Or go negative)

    • Bennettiquette@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 months ago

      i just can’t wait for all of irans proxies to start investing resources into replicating such a successful strategy. i have the utmost respect for judaism but israel is a serious problem and they are no where near ready to stop swinging their dicks around.

  • jordanlund@lemmy.worldM
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    82
    ·
    3 months ago

    This makes more sense than them being able to remotely overload a battery to make it explode.

  • El_guapazo@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    82
    ·
    3 months ago

    How do we know these were actual terrorists and not just random people that bought a pager?

    They’ve classified infants as Hamas terrorists before so I’m a bit skeptical.

    • Agent641@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      55
      ·
      3 months ago

      The splodey ones all came from the same batches that were bought by Hezbolla-linked companies and distributed by them to hezbolla members. They didnt just ‘upgrade’ every pager made by gold apollo. Only batches destined for Hez.

      Of course, theres undoubtedly a lot of people who ended up with one of the booby trapped batch, who are just regular doctors, nurses, workers, etc, and theres no certainty that the person who was issued the pager was holding it at the time. Could have been their kid, or wife, or whatever, so the attack was still not very discriminate.

    • Keeponstalin@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      3 months ago

      It’s worth noting that Hezbollah members aren’t just militant fighters. There are also social services and Parliamentary members

      Hezbollah organizes and maintains an extensive social development program and runs hospitals, news services, educational facilities, and encouragement of Nikah mut’ah. One of its established institutions, Jihad Al Binna’s Reconstruction Campaign, is responsible for numerous economic and infrastructure development projects in Lebanon. Hezbollah controls the Martyr’s Institute (Al-Shahid Social Association)

      Hezbollah holds 14 of the 128 seats in the Parliament of Lebanon and is a member of the Resistance and Development Bloc. According to Daniel L. Byman, it is “the most powerful single political movement in Lebanon.” Hezbollah, along with the Amal Movement, represents most of Lebanese Shi’a. Unlike Amal, Hezbollah has not disarmed. Hezbollah participates in the Parliament of Lebanon.

    • cartoon meme dog@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      3 months ago

      One can reasonably assume they studied the communications for a few weeks to figure out who’s who, and then sent the detonate code to a certain list of pager numbers.

  • Moah
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    45
    ·
    3 months ago

    Who is a terrorist state exactly?

    • Blackmist@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      48
      ·
      3 months ago

      Both?

      I mean I’m no fan of Israel, but Hezbollah ain’t exactly the Red Cross.

      • xor
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        3 months ago

        And, frankly, this is one of the least morally concerning things Israel has (presumably) done. The pagers were targeted specifically because they were used almost exclusively by Hezbollah.

        • WanderingVentra@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          21
          ·
          edit-2
          3 months ago

          Dude they injured thousands of people and killed children and health care workers. This is 100% terrorism. I guess it’s a better than the active genocide they’re doing though, so it’s a low bar.

        • Count042@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          3 months ago

          They were not exclusively used by Hezbollah.

          Also, you’re equating a government with it’s militant wing.

          Is it proper to call an Israeli Doctor a member of IDF? That is what you are doing.

          Hospital administrators (A government position for non insane countries) are Hezbollah.

          • xor
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            3 months ago

            Yeah that’s a fair point wrt non-militant roles, my assumption was that they were primarily used in the military since their purpose was to avoid the issues with mobile networks being used to track them.

            But we don’t know exactly how the devices were distributed, so you’re right that there were potentially a large number of non-military Hezbollah staff.

            • Count042@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              3 months ago

              They’ve been doing the same for Hamas. Hospital administrator? Hamas. And so Israel bombs out their apartment killing them and their entire family. You know, back when there were apartments.

              Same for police.

              That one is what gives away Israels genocidal intent. Getting rid of police gets rid of the first line of defense against civil disorder, and the people most likely to do stuff like distribute food and supplies.

              Police very rarely end up fighting as militantsin occupied countries, too. Unless you fire them en masse, which occupying countries shouldn’t do, if they’re smart.

              Edit: We do know multiple EMT teams and doctors were hit by the beepers.

        • iAvicenna@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          3 months ago

          probably more civilians than the targeted number of Hezbollah militant members died, orders of magnitude more wounded, crippled etc. success?

      • iAvicenna@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        3 months ago

        with Israel clearly having the greater outreach, destructive power and perhaps even less self regulation than Hezbollah as it seems.

  • Fedizen@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    43
    ·
    edit-2
    3 months ago

    Imagine if everyone’s phone exploded to execute like 10 guys.

    Edit: The take aways here are

    1. Israel is a terrorist nation, that views civilian casualties as bonus points

    2. any country who imports their electronics instead of making their own is susceptible to this kind of tampering.

    3. The press is covering a terror attack like its some kind of new video game

    4. All the unexploded ordinance can be delivered to Hezbollah as a gift. If the rumor is true that this was triggered because they became aware of the bombs, there will likely be many israelis killed by these explosives in the near future.

  • Icalasari@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    36
    ·
    3 months ago

    What is Israel trying to do, beat Canada’s record for war crimes added to the Geneva Convention?

    Or are they trying to piss off the Middle East enough to get them all to bomb them all at once so they can demand the US send in troops to protect them, dragging the world ever closer to WWIII because their sociopathic leader wants to genocide a people to get real estate?

      • Icalasari@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        24
        ·
        3 months ago

        Canada in WWII basically invented a bunch of entirely new warcrimes

        There’s a reason Nazi Germany was terrified of Canadians and convinced they were demons sent from hell itself

        EDIT: Got which world war wrong. Nazi Germany feared Canada because of what Canada did in WWI

          • Icalasari@fedia.io
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            24
            ·
            3 months ago

            Whoops, got which world war wrong. It was world war one

            https://nationalpost.com/news/canada/the-forgotten-ferocity-of-canadas-soldiers-in-the-great-war (I know, ew, National Post)

            https://www.cbc.ca/history/SECTIONSE1EP12CH1LE.html (holy shit CBC update this part of your site. This one is more to back it up in that even with pride behind it, it kind of has an underlying tone of… Holding back)

            It’s hard to find direct proper sources since it seems we’ve buried that part of our history some and Google sucks ass these days, but I’ll edit in more as I find them

            EDIT: https://web.viu.ca/davies/H355H.Cda.WWI/Cook.PoliticsOfSurrender.pdf (university site)

            • phdepressed@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              15
              ·
              3 months ago

              First link is behind a paywall, second link doesn’t have anything about war crimes, third link is an academic paper talking about surrendering germans and how they were often killed by Canadian forces. It notes that killing of surrendering forces was an all participants type thing not entirely specific to Canada though. Even notes that Britain was particularly bad about surrendering enemies due to fake surrenders in the South African War just a decade or so before.

              • naught@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                6
                ·
                3 months ago

                I’ve just read a book about Somme, and it’s absolutely true for that battle that surrendered enemies were killed for mere convenience - so they wouldn’t have to take them back and feed them. I read this of the British in particular, but that’s who the book was about, so.

              • shaserlark@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                4
                ·
                3 months ago

                The first link wasn’t behind a paywall and talks exactly about what OP mentioned, actually it’s a horrible read and while apparently everyone (Germans, French, British, …) was just busy fighting a war they didn’t really care about, Canadians were on a mission to slaughter Germans for whatever reason.

          • huginn@feddit.it
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            14
            ·
            3 months ago

            Not op - as far as I can tell they weren’t particularly warcrimey for WW2.

            They killed a bunch of German POWs during the invasion of Sicily and killed 20 civilians while burning down a town for a supposed civilian killing a commander (turned out it was an enemy combatant).

            Both deeply abhorrent but not “inventing new crimes”

  • kent_eh@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    31
    ·
    edit-2
    3 months ago

    Thar makes a lot more sense than the headlines claiming that the pagers were “hacked” by some remote exploit.

  • finitebanjo@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    21
    ·
    edit-2
    3 months ago

    Pagers. Can’t imagine who the foremost users of pagers would be in 2024.

    *cough doctors *cough

    • Flying Squid@lemmy.worldM
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      18
      ·
      edit-2
      3 months ago

      I have not seen a doctor with a pager in a long time and I have spent a ton of time in hospitals over the past year. They all have smartwatches now.

      • Shiftless@infosec.pub
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        15
        ·
        3 months ago

        Doctors still have pagers. The pager will just have a phone number the doctor needs to call as to not violate patient privacy. Instead of calling the doctor directly, they use a pager to request a call because of the bad service that is common within hospitals. At least that’s what I know

      • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        3 months ago

        I have not seen a doctor with a pager in a long time

        My friend’s a pulminologist and his hospital still uses pagers. They just never bothered to upgrade their 20 year old system to use SMS. And he says he’s partial to it, because he’s not forced to check his phone every time it rings when 99% of the messages are spam texts anyway.

      • IphtashuFitz@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        3 months ago

        Back when cell phones were just starting to get “smart” I knew a few folks that carried both a pager & phone. They lived in rural areas where pager coverage was decent but phone coverage was spotty at best, and non-existent in places.

      • IndustryStandard@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        3 months ago

        Is this universal around all of Lebanon or only the hospital you were at? There were reports claiming medical personnel were hit with the pagers.

        • Flying Squid@lemmy.worldM
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          3 months ago

          Did OP mean in Lebanon when they said that doctors in 2024 were the foremost use of pagers?

          Since they asked which country I was talking about, I think they just meant it in general.

          • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            3 months ago

            That’s not true. Pagers are still in regular use for two reasons:

            • Hospitals hate upgrading their tech infrastructure, so they’ll sit on a 20 year old system until it falls to pieces

            • Pagers don’t get spam texts at the same volume as cell phones, so you can be confident that when your pager rings its serious and not automated solicitations.

              • finitebanjo@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                edit-2
                3 months ago

                For using deviced capable of recording audio and transmitting photos of the environment at all times. Every patient that comes through has all of their vulnerabilities exposed.

                I hope hospitals that promote such behavior get sued into the ground.

  • BaroqueInMind@lemmy.one
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    3 months ago

    This was such a cool way to kill bad guys. I hope to read more about how they did this like their Stuxnet virus blew up Iranian centrifuges

      • Madison420@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        13
        ·
        edit-2
        3 months ago

        You misunderstand, they’re being sarcastic.

        Ed: to be specific they reference the most famous result of unexpected consequences.

        The US government created a virus managed stucnet that infested and threw off industrial controllers of a specific brand they knew were used with Iranian centrifuges that enrich nuclear material. Their plan worked and the centrifuges were destroyed.

        Later on they found out stuxnet accidently infected a bunch of other controllers, ones that were in hospitals, power plants ect. It ended up being one of the most widespread viruses ever.

        Essentially they’re saying planting bombs in pagers could never have unexpected consequences. /S

    • tuckerm@supermeter.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      23
      ·
      3 months ago

      The way that they pulled off this attack is interesting from a cybersecurity standpoint, but we can’t ignore the fact that Israel had no way of knowing who was near the devices when they exploded. They very nature of this attack made it impossible for Israel to know how closely they were targeting the bad guys or how many civilians were nearby.

    • Count042@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      3 months ago

      Target large swathes of civilian populations is incredible targeting?

      Only to those that think race/religion is what determines if someone is a legitimate target.

    • theyoyomaster@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      edit-2
      3 months ago

      Depending on what airports they tried to go through they likely would have been caught. Even garbage security theater like the TSA catches concealed explosives fairly well.

      • ShepherdPie@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        3 months ago

        Could you imagine going through security and then getting arrested for trying to carry explosives onto a plane?

        • theyoyomaster@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          3 months ago

          I feel like it would be pretty quickly determined that you are the “victim” in that scenario. I have actually carried explosives through a TSA checkpoint before though; it was the BEST LAYOVER EVER. They came to the lounge I was in asking for volunteers to train the dogs and then handed me a backpack with semtex in it and put me in line. The dog found me, I told him he was a GOOD BOY and got to throw his kong for him and rub his belly. 45/10, would layover again.

          • FarFarAway@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            3 months ago

            That happen to a person in our group in Australia, but with cocaine. We were waiting to collect our baggage before customs. The officers told them to put it in thier waistline and see if the dog would sniff it out. Pups was sucessful and got some pets. He didn’t have a Kong tho.

    • catloaf@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      3 months ago

      I assume they use the cell phone network these days, so any in flight probably weren’t able to receive the signal. On board but not at elevation is a pretty small window, so the number could be as small as zero.