🍹Early to RISA 🧉@sh.itjust.worksM to Greentext@sh.itjust.works · 3 days agoAnon starts asking questionssh.itjust.worksimagemessage-square81fedilinkarrow-up1641
arrow-up1641imageAnon starts asking questionssh.itjust.works🍹Early to RISA 🧉@sh.itjust.worksM to Greentext@sh.itjust.works · 3 days agomessage-square81fedilink
minus-squaredodgy_bagellinkfedilinkarrow-up7·3 days agoEveryone is wrong. It’s the encabulation effect.
minus-squarengwoo@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4·2 days agoModern bicycles include an isotropic harmonization manifold to achieve the same thing without an encabulator.
minus-squareBowtiesAreCool@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up3·2 days agoWell they took 6 hydrocomptic marzel vains, and fitted them carefully to the ambiphasiant lunar wainshaft. This effectively prevents side fumbling.
minus-squaredodgy_bagellinkfedilinkarrow-up2·2 days agoI’m looking through google scholar and I can’t seem to dig up anything about this. Could you express the principle in terms of stilted Newton pentameter?
Everyone is wrong. It’s the encabulation effect.
Modern bicycles include an isotropic harmonization manifold to achieve the same thing without an encabulator.
How do they account for side fumbling?
Well they took 6 hydrocomptic marzel vains, and fitted them carefully to the ambiphasiant lunar wainshaft. This effectively prevents side fumbling.
I’m looking through google scholar and I can’t seem to dig up anything about this.
Could you express the principle in terms of stilted Newton pentameter?