The Supreme Court was hit by a flurry of damaging new leaks Sunday as a series of confidential memos written by the chief justice were revealed by The New York Times.

The court’s Chief Justice John Roberts was clear to his fellow justices in February: He wanted the court to take up a case weighing Donald Trump’s right to presidential immunity—and he seemed inclined to protect the former president.

“I think it likely that we will view the separation of powers analysis differently,” Roberts wrote to his Supreme Court peers, according to a private memo obtained by the *Times. *He was referencing the D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals’ decision to allow the case to move forward.

Roberts took an unusual level of involvement in this and other cases that ultimately benefited Trump, according to the Times— his handling of the cases surprised even some other justices on the high court, across ideological lines. As president, Trump appointed three of the members of its current conservative supermajority.

    • YtA4QCam2A9j7EfTgHrH@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      43
      ·
      2 months ago

      I think Oliver also offered him $1 million a year from Oliver’s personal moneys. Which is not an insignificant amount of money for a justice who isn’t corrupt.

      • nul9o9@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        29
        ·
        2 months ago

        In the past, he signaled he’d retire because he wasn’t getting paid enough, meaning he needed to be bribed to keep a conservative justice on the SCOTUS.

        If you take it at face value, then he should have jumped at John Olivers’ offer.

        • MonkRome@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          21
          ·
          2 months ago

          The only thing Thomas likes more than money is respect. He would never take Oliver money because it would publicly embarrass him. He hates embarrassment more than anything.

          • partial_accumen@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            8
            ·
            2 months ago

            Embarrassment suggests he has a sense of shame. He has already conducted a number of shameful acts already (taking gifts) without any sense he’s embarrassed.

            • MonkRome@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              7
              ·
              2 months ago

              When he was in front of the Senate confirmation hearing he was absolutely embarrassed. He knew everyone was watching while he was accused of sexual harassment. He basically stopped interacting with the media because he was so furious with how he was portrayed publicly. Dude hates being publicly shamed. Doesn’t mean he’s wise enough to stop doing shitty things.

              • captainlezbian@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                2 months ago

                Yeah he’s not shameless. You can say a lot of negative things about him, but he has a hell of an ego and being publicly criticized and embarrassed pisses him off. Though nothing seems to anger him like being pitied.

                Shameless and integrityless are different things and he has shame but not integrity.

    • pubquiz@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      This one would be newer. A truth lost on us plebes who have to pay for things.