• MrMamiya@feddit.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    83
    ·
    1 year ago

    Ancient engineers: let’s make it work.

    Modern engineers: we need to make sure it breaks at approximately 36 months to ensure low ability to claim warranty while also ensuring the customer believes it could have been a fluke.

    Or, roughly translated into engineer speak…”anyone can build an aqueduct, it takes skill to build an aqueduct using the minimum amount of material required”.

    • yimby@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      1 year ago

      I’ve never met an engineer who wanted to intentionally design products to break.

      The beancounters on the other hand…

      • JohnDClay@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        It depends on the way you think about it. When designing, I want all my parts (other than user replaceable wear components) to fail at the same time. That means nothing is the weakest link, failing earlier than the design otherwise could handle.

  • ImplyingImplications@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    51
    ·
    1 year ago

    Anyone can design a 70 mile long aqueduct. It takes a skilled engineer to design a 70 mile long aqueduct using the minimal amount of materials necessary.

    • Player2@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      22
      ·
      1 year ago

      Something something anyone can build a strong bridge, only an engineer can build a bridge that just barely doesn’t collapse

  • zarquon@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    44
    ·
    1 year ago

    As I learned in engineering school…

    “Any idiot can build a bridge which doesn’t fall down. It takes an engineer to build a bridge which bearly doesn’t fall down”

  • FarFarAway@startrek.website
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    1 year ago

    Bahaha! You think an engineer even knows how to work autocad?

    Maybe 10 or 20 years ago, this mighy apply. At this point they leave the hard work for everyone else to figure out and draw up.

    They just grab thier stamp.

    (This, at least, applies to one’s in the US. I apologize to any one who actually applies their degree to their field)

  • IBSshitposter
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    the numbers say that adding an extra lane will save each person crossing 31¢ worth of time, which justifies the $51 million project over it’s 30 year life span. Here’s a copy-paste blueprint from a site I worked on 10 years ago that won’t make it’s execution time, emptying out all our flex money. Guess we’ll have to push off the potholes til next year