No one owes you an explanation for anything, You’re demanding an explanation for someone else’s actions the same way that Democrats demand votes from everyone. They’re not entitled and you were not entitled.
I am a Dem and I’d really love that all citizens people vote. Be good if they took an active interest in our democracy. Your statement isn’t entirely wrong it’s just not entirely correct.
You apparently are pretty confused. “you have to” and “you would” are extremely different phrases, and I never once implied they were similar. Only that you wouldn’t need to pretend “the articles are interesting” is your motivation, in a context which implicates you as sketch af, if you weren’t sketch af.
You’d simply explain it and avoid thousands of replies telling you how horrible you are. I guess it’s possible you’re a masochist who likes being insulted, but I think the other explanation is much more likely ;)
You’d simply explain it and avoid thousands of replies telling you how horrible you are.
I don’t care if “thousands” of people are telling me how “horrible” I am. I can post what I want as long as it fits the community guidelines. And I will continue to do so.
And I don’t have to explain anything to you. Thank you!
But the fact is that if there were a legit reason, you would.
No one owes you an explanation for anything, You’re demanding an explanation for someone else’s actions the same way that Democrats demand votes from everyone. They’re not entitled and you were not entitled.
I am a Dem and I’d really love that all citizens people vote. Be good if they took an active interest in our democracy. Your statement isn’t entirely wrong it’s just not entirely correct.
Not entirely wrong and not entirely correct makes perfect sense for someone with a hammer a sickle next to their username.
You saying I got some flare next to my handle!? Hell yeah! Can’t see it on my lemmy client. Oh, you mean OP.
Removed by mod
Removed, civility.
Thank you!
Nope. I don’t have to explain anything to you. Stay as mad as you want. Under this username or your various other ones. But I owe you nothing. :)
You apparently are pretty confused. “you have to” and “you would” are extremely different phrases, and I never once implied they were similar. Only that you wouldn’t need to pretend “the articles are interesting” is your motivation, in a context which implicates you as sketch af, if you weren’t sketch af.
You’d simply explain it and avoid thousands of replies telling you how horrible you are. I guess it’s possible you’re a masochist who likes being insulted, but I think the other explanation is much more likely ;)
I don’t care if “thousands” of people are telling me how “horrible” I am. I can post what I want as long as it fits the community guidelines. And I will continue to do so.
And I don’t have to explain anything to you. Thank you!
Again, no one said you had to. But you would, if there weren’t something insidious behind this bizarre behavior.
No I wouldn’t, because I don’t have to.
Your only principle is “if I have to do something, I’ll do it, I guess”.
rofl
I don’t know what you mean. But I don’t have to explain any of my personal views to you. Thank you!
Are you Donald Trump in disguise?