• aeronmelon@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      3 months ago

      X, spoken as a letter = ecks

      Hard phonetic sound = zz, same as the letter Z (almost always at the beginning of a word. Xylophone)

      Soft phonetic sound = ksk (never at the beginning of a word. Box, oxen)

      (disclaimer: American English, ymmv.)

      • oyfrog@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        3 months ago

        By this definition, Xolo wouldn’t fit because the x in Xolo is somewhere between sh- and ch-. It’s a Nahuatl word and many (if not all) Xs are sh-/ch-.

        Sorry for being pedantic.

    • webghost0101@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      edit-2
      3 months ago

      No, i think i get it but difficult to explain.

      Say X, X, X in a row

      Then say

      Xylo , Xen, Xono

      The Raw letter has different phonet-x to how it’s often applied.

      When were talking about teaching kids the alphabet we need to train both individual and applied letters

      I do realize that this might be very cultural and language dependent but i am pretty sure we’re talking plain english.

      • Mirodir@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        3 months ago

        When were talking about teaching kids the alphabet we need to train both individual and applied letters

        This is only slightly related but I once met a young (USAmerican) adult who thought the stripy horse animal’s name was pronounced zed-bra in British English and it was really hard to convince her otherwise. In her mind zebra was strongly connected to Z-bra, so of course if someone was to pronounce the letter “zed” it would turn into “zed-bra” and not just into “zeh-bra”.