LibertyLizard@slrpnk.net to science@lemmy.world · 6 个月前The Theory That Men Evolved to Hunt and Women Evolved to Gather Is Wrongwww.scientificamerican.comexternal-linkmessage-square87fedilinkarrow-up1369file-textcross-posted to: anarcho_primitivism@lemmy.worldscience@beehaw.orgfeminism@kbin.socialarchaeology@mander.xyz
arrow-up1369external-linkThe Theory That Men Evolved to Hunt and Women Evolved to Gather Is Wrongwww.scientificamerican.comLibertyLizard@slrpnk.net to science@lemmy.world · 6 个月前message-square87fedilinkfile-textcross-posted to: anarcho_primitivism@lemmy.worldscience@beehaw.orgfeminism@kbin.socialarchaeology@mander.xyz
minus-squareChonkyOwlbear@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up19·6 个月前How does it not? Running 26 miles takes endurance and running it fast takes even more endurance.
minus-squarefafferlicious@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up7·6 个月前Stride length would like a word. Strength, speed, and endurance are related. You’re right. But it’s not as clear as faster time == better endurance.
minus-squareChonkyOwlbear@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up2·6 个月前Longer stride length also equals a heavier body weight to move. I’m sure there’s some sort of graph where the vertex represents the most efficient combination of those factors.
How does it not? Running 26 miles takes endurance and running it fast takes even more endurance.
Stride length would like a word.
Strength, speed, and endurance are related. You’re right. But it’s not as clear as faster time == better endurance.
Longer stride length also equals a heavier body weight to move. I’m sure there’s some sort of graph where the vertex represents the most efficient combination of those factors.