The shooter is a sovereign citizen.

  • AstridWipenaugh@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    115
    ·
    3 months ago

    I bet the officer reached towards his waistband or glovebox. He thought he had something in his hand. The officer was acting suspicious. The officer had a history of crime, a runin with the law when he was 12.The sovcit felt threatened and had to defend himself! Those are the talking points, right?

  • Maggoty@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    87
    ·
    3 months ago

    Fucking hell that title. Made me think a police officer shot two other police officers.

  • BigMacHole@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    66
    ·
    3 months ago

    Was the Cop on Drugs? Was he wearing a Hoodie? Did he smoke a Joint once? Was he Sleeping? ALL these things are Things Cops have Killed people over so it’s safe to Assume these are Dangerous Activities that REQUIRE violent intervention!

  • cygnus@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    31
    ·
    3 months ago

    This post has brought out the worst of Lemmy. At least I can find respite in the fact that those glorifying this are merely edgelord keyboard warriors and have absolutely no measurable impact on the real world.

  • partial_accumen@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    29
    ·
    3 months ago

    I’m am sure this post will top the “sort by controversial” list.

    From the article: “Cobb-Bey purchased the weapons legally”.

      • BleatingZombie@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        18
        ·
        edit-2
        3 months ago

        I’m sorry. I need to vent

        In the past 3 days I’ve been downvoted for commenting that gay people can adopt babies (in 196 for that matter) and asking why a news article about a bridge seemed to have one photo with a concrete floor and one with a wood floor. I commented asking why I was getting downvoted and someone told me it’s because I said it’s two different bridges (which I most certainly didn’t say) and someone else was sarcastic and rude

        People on Lemmy are proving to get more toxic as time goes on. I’m considering going back to reddit more and more. Sure, the place is horrible, but I don’t feel bad about myself when I feel brave enough to comment

        Edit: Can somebody who’s downvoting me please tell me what I said that was wrong? I really just want to know

        • partial_accumen@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          14
          ·
          3 months ago

          In the past 3 days I’ve been downvoted for commenting that gay people can adopt babies (in 196 for that matter)

          I was curious so I went looking in your post history for an innocent and clear comment communicating “that gay people can adopt babies”. I found your comment, and immediately understood why you were downvoted for it. Here it is in context:

          The OP was this:

          and your comment was below one response to the OP:

          I don’t know if English is your second language, or if you’re not used to drawing meaning from poetry rather than fact from prose. The person you replied to was giving a poetic answer. Keep in mind, I’m not saying I agree or disagree with any of the opinions listed above, simply that I can grasp the ideas and concepts the people were communicating in what they wrote:

          When that poster said poetically “Every man is the son of a woman” they were communicating the idea that every man, that grows up to be an “undesirable adult” (as reflected by the OPs post) was once, at least for a fraction of a second, under the care of a woman (as in: thats how biology works). Further, the vast majority of those that would be men were under the care of women for many years, and if they grew to be “undesirable”, then previous generations of women had a hand in raising them that way and are therefore at least partially responsible for them being “undesirable”. Again, I’m not lending my voice in agreement or disagreement, I’m simply translating what they were saying poetically into an easier to understand block of text for you. It is up to you to form your own opinion.

          What you responded with was appearing to contradict the poster as though they wrote prose. You focused exclusively on the idea that a tiny fraction of men are raised by a set of same sex parents ignoring the fact that the vast men aren’t raised in that situation. Further your “yes and no” seemed to suggest it could be as high as 50/50 split, which is of course, far far from reality.

          Your downvotes were earned by you with people essentially saying:

          If you need another example to highly what you did. Imagine the original post was Shakespeare’s like from Romeo and Juliet:

          “What’s in a name? That which we call a rose, by any other word would smell as sweet.”

          And you responded with:

          “Shakespeare was probably referring to Old Garden Roses (Rosaceae Gallicas) and it does have a unique fragrance”

          You might be kind of factually correct, but Shakespeare was writing poetically, not referring to a specific plant, but that the properties of the thing apply to it irrespective of whatever name we attach to it. Nobody cares what the genus and species of rose Shakespeare was referring to because the meaning of the idea he was communicating was separate from that.

        • apfelwoiSchoppen@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          13
          ·
          edit-2
          3 months ago

          Malicious downvoting is rampant here. People are a bit more silo’d on reddit which leads to less noise and more positivity when a user sticks to their chosen subs. I get the feeling that people here stick to the All or Local feeds which leads to a lot of negativity.

        • Soup@lemmy.cafe
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          3 months ago

          The majority of lemmy is grade school/high school aged kids. Don’t expect reasonable responses to anything here and you’ll do just fine.

            • Soup@lemmy.cafe
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              3 months ago

              I’m not sure anyone can ever know- but I base my evaluation on the immaturity and ignorance that so prevalent here.

          • BleatingZombie@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            10
            ·
            3 months ago

            Thank you. I feel a lot better knowing it’s just morons like you downvoting me. To be honest, I had no idea a stereotype like you actually existed

            I feel so bad for you that I actually feel better about myself!

  • Jiggle_Physics@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    25
    ·
    3 months ago

    I can’t remember where I saw it, because it has been years, but a bunch of the Sovcits were passing a video of a man, that state police pulled over, threatening that if they didn’t just leave, he was going to start a gun fight. So they left. They were all sharing it around, claiming victory, sucking each other off. Then, like a year or so later, a news article came out where they decided to watch the guy closely. Instead of just arresting him, they collected a bunch of criminal infractions to charge him with. Then, when he was coming out of some store, or restaurant, or whatever, they ambushed him and took him in.

    Long story short, he had CP. Possibly was paying an underage girl for sex. ALL the sovcit hang-outs were immediately perma-banning anyone who posted it.

    Like, I passionately despise the legal industry here. From the cops to the legislators. However, all they have done is make it so cops assume anyone, who doesn’t immediately start sucking them off, is a sovcit. This makes them even more likely to be violent, and they do everything they can to make sure anyone that doesn’t listen to their unlawful BS, is associated with that movement.

    • BonesOfTheMoon@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      28
      ·
      3 months ago

      I see both sides. There’s a great deal of corruption, racism, and ineptitude and shit behaviour by a lot of cops that has led to a deep mistrust and dislike, and it’s valid. Do they deserve to be executed by batshit right wing conspiracy crazies? No. They deserve regulation and discipline and overhaul.

    • Maggoty@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      3 months ago

      Whatever you do, don’t look at the Ukrainian communities after a fresh drop of drone footage. If this makes you clutch your pearls…

        • Maggoty@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          11
          ·
          3 months ago

          That Russian was just sitting in his trench. The cop was just sitting in his car. The Russians invaded Ukraine. The cops declared war on minorities. Sure they called it drugs, but we have Nixon on tape admitting it was about minority and liberal communities.

          Isn’t it funny that we know that now and these places haven’t taken their foot off the gas in regards to drugs and broken windows? You may choose to ignore it but large parts of our country don’t have that choice.

          • Soulg@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            3 months ago

            How absolutely demented do you have to be to declare being a cop is analogous to Russia invading Ukraine

            • Maggoty@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              3 months ago

              I’m not the one telling them to think like an invading army and commit acts that would be a war crime if the military did it.

              Now to be clear they aren’t committing crimes at the same rate as the Russian Army who is using chemical warfare daily now, but the general comparison is a lot closer than I think many Americans are comfortable with.

      • jpreston2005@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        3 months ago

        U.S. District Judge Charles Simpson’s ruling declared that the actions of Taylor’s boyfriend, who fired a shot at police the night of the raid, were the legal cause of her death, not a bad warrant.

        That’s the quote. I didn’t lie, I shortened it.

        • tastysnacks@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          3 months ago

          You used quotes. That’s for repeating what someone said verbatim. And “the legal cause ofnher death” is very different than she was killed by the boyfriend.

  • Soup@lemmy.cafe
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    edit-2
    3 months ago

    Imagine celebrating the death of a human being, knowing that their family’s lives are forever changed-

    And feeling good about yourself.

    Stay classy lemmy.

    EDIT: look at all the cowards downvoting without having the balls to respond. There are the type of people that will celebrate the death of innocent people.