• Maggoty@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    23
    ·
    edit-2
    3 months ago

    Hulu was really good a decade ago. Then they put ads in and created a higher tier. Nobody was surprised when it happened again some years later.

    In Ukraine starlink was being hailed as a hero before Elon decided to turn off Internet access in areas he deemed Ukraine to be “too aggressive”.

    Goodwill doesn’t deserve it’s reputation. It uses minimum wage exemptions for disabled people to pay it’s staff below minimum wage.

    Edit to add - Destiny 2 was the other one I was thinking of and couldn’t quite place. Great PvE shooter with great story, and they killed it to force people to buy DLC.

    • funkless_eck@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      3 months ago

      D2’s problem is different. To succeed critically they needed to produce The Taken King or The Witch Queen every content cycle, but there’s no way to do that except release only once a year — but they wanted to release every 3 months, so they made shitty DLCs that everyone mildly disliked and hyped them up so people actively disliked them on release.

      Then the shitty mini DLCs began cannibalizing the dev, time and monetary budget from the main DLCs and it fell into a downward spiral.

      • Maggoty@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        3 months ago

        Yeah that wasn’t great but I think it was the part where they literally deleted a bunch of the story so you either bought the DLC or wandered the maps aimlessly killing stuff that really broke any good will left.

        • Queen HawlSera@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          3 months ago

          Or worse… you bought the DLC and had no idea what was going on because you’re a newer player and they deleted the story that this DLC is a follow up.too…

    • NotMyOldRedditName@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      3 months ago

      It’s amazing how people still get things wrong ages after it’s been corrected by the author and spread misinformation and the hate involved with it.

      Elon didn’t turn starlink off. It was always off. It was never ON to be turned OFF.

      Further, allowing ukraine to use starlink as a weapon in an offensive attack was against the terms of service and would put spacex in a very difficult position with regulations. That’s why the DoD took it over, and it’s okay now.

      • Maggoty@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        3 months ago

        If it was always off then why did they lose Internet? And why was Ukraine’s counter offensive bad but Russia’s offensive okay?

        • NotMyOldRedditName@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          3 months ago

          They lost internet because they went out of range of where it was on. They assumed it was on everywhere.

          They strapped them onto boats where the internet was on, and drove them to where the internet was off. Then they begged SpaceX to turn them on, and they refused.

          Not turning it on to allow the attack was in line with the terms of service and weapons export rules. SpaceX doesn’t want their consuner service to be considered a weapon.

          Russia was getting satellites from 3rd parties and using them in ukraine because they work in ukraine.

          Edit: and just to clarify, now that the DoD is managing this for ukraine through a contract with SpaceX, the DoD is allowing its use as a weapon AFAIK.

          • Maggoty@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            3 months ago

            A. That’s not how satellites work

            B. The US considers Crimea to be Ukrainian territory.

            C. These uplinks were already purchased by the DoD, who was very vocal about Elon fucking with the signal.

            I know it sucks that your idol turned out to be the vain villain instead of Tony Stark but we were all here. We all remember.

            • NotMyOldRedditName@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              3 months ago

              Lol, service absolutely can be turned on and off based on regions. SpaceX doesn’t turn it on in a region until the local government had an agreement with them. Just because the US gov sees Crimea as Ukraine does not mean SpaceX is obliged to turn it on there.

              And no, there was no DoD contract in place at the time. SpaceX was providing services for free out of their own goodwill.

              The DoD had a formal contact in place in June 2023, the incident falsely commented on by OP was in 2022.

              Edit below

              https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Starlink_in_the_Russo-Ukrainian_War

              You can go read it all in the wiki yourself but the relevant part

              In June 2023, the Department of Defense officialized a contract with Shotwell’s SpaceX to buy Starlink satellite services for Ukraine.[10] The deal includes the Pentagon buying 400-500 Starlink terminals for Ukraine, giving the Pentagon control of where Starlink works inside the country without fear of interruption.[79] The terms of services of the final contract were undisclosed for security issues.[10] Following the contract, The Pentagon stated Starlink was a “vital layer in Ukraine’s overall communications network” amidst “a range of global partners to ensure Ukraine has the capabilities they need.”[10]

              Edit: oh, you’re OP. LOL