• PugJesus@lemmy.worldOPM
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      5 months ago

      No clue! I’m guessing the fact that it didn’t catch on suggests it’s impractical, at the very least.

    • Setiyeti93@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      5 months ago

      It was less than effective. Perhaps situational.

      In an intense fire this just made thing worse. Especially for the person wearing it. Plus supplying water to this was not ideal either. Especially as the water used here is water that couldn’t be pumped into the main hose.

        • Not a replicant@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          5 months ago

          Water absorbs a tremendous amount of heat, and if it’s being continually replenished from a cold supply, the hot water won’t stay around long enough.

    • MeatPilot@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      5 months ago

      This would make it so much worse. Water would just increase the heat transfer to the wearer.

      Good home example, if you wet an oven mit and try picking up a hot pan with it, it will burn your fucking hand. If it was dry, it wouldn’t transfer the heat as fast.