Much of the land near the atomic bomb’s birthplace was converted to recreational areas, but toxic waste remains

Soil, plants and water along popular recreation spots near Los Alamos, New Mexico, the birthplace of the atomic bomb, are contaminated with “extreme concentrations” of plutonium, a new study has found, but calls for the federal government to act have been dismissed.

Michael Ketterer, a Northern Arizona University scientist and lead researcher on the project, said the plutonium levels in and around New Mexico’s Acid Canyon were among the highest he had ever seen in a publicly accessible area in the US during his decades-long career – comparable to what is found in Ukraine at the site of the Chornobyl nuclear disaster.

The radioactive isotopes are “hiding in plain sight”, Ketterer said.

  • AmidFuror@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    88
    ·
    3 months ago

    The comparison to Chernobyl is obviously powerful rhetorically, but is it relevant? Is plutonium the most dangerous set of isotopes at Chernobyl? Are there other decay products at Chernobyl that make it an exclusion zone which are not present at Los Alamos?

    It should be a scientific discussion which informs public policy, and framing it as comparable to Chernobyl is perhaps misleading.

    • skillissuer@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      42
      ·
      3 months ago

      fuck no, currently most important isotopes are cs-137 and sr-90, both with half lives about 30 years. plutonium isotopes have half lives from 14 (241; probably tiny amount) 90 (238; also not much) to thousands of years (239 and 240; most likely bulk of it). what did the most damage in chernobyl were even shorter lived (days) and so spicier isotopes that normally are given time to decay in spent fuel pools

      • lolcatnip@reddthat.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        19
        ·
        3 months ago

        As a tangent, I hate the way reporting often lists the longest half lives, ignoring that fact that the longer the half life of an isotope is, the less dangerous it is. Highly radioactive isotopes are highly radioactive because they have short half lives.

        • GreyEyedGhost@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          3 months ago

          If you think Pu238 with its half-life of 90 years is scary, check out Fe60 with its half-life of 2.6 million years. That must be super scary!

          /s

          I’m aware that everything with a higher atomic weight than iron wants to be iron.