The Republican Party cannot blame the media's positive reaction to Vice President Kamala Harris for the downturn in their fortunes, wrote National Review executive editor Mark Antonio Wright. Rather, their problem begins with the fact that they "picked a bad candidate" to lead the ticket.The Nationa...
  • SmilingSolaris@lemmy.world
    17·
    3 months ago

    Is this bait? Like, are you trolling? Because I didn’t make the chart. You clearly understand the chart. You just want to start a fight over the title of the chart? It’s a silly name for a funny chart. Calm down bruv.

        • Doom@ttrpg.network
          2·
          3 months ago

          Are you people actually insane?

          Please indicate where it explains Carter was a bad president

          • SmilingSolaris@lemmy.world
            1·
            3 months ago

            Chart is labeled. Doesn’t mean anything more than he didn’t get elected twice. Like, Carter is cool. I like Carter. But the chart is labeled brother. The joke being made is that many presidents have had failures, like Carter’s failure to get elected again. Is it really his fault? Not really, but this chart isn’t about Carter. It’s not that deep bruv.

            Like, your just yelling that Carter didn’t suck where the only qualifying requirement to “suck” is one of the three circles. It’s a joke. A gaff. A goof. Why are you swinging like someone just spit on him and called him Hitler?

            • Doom@ttrpg.network
              1·
              3 months ago

              Literally not yelling tho lol

              Really reread this entire thread. I asked how Carter sucked and got a snarky comment.

              This chart is labeled presidents that sucked, I really just asked how Carter falls into that. I truly don’t understand how anything I said was taken this far.