• lolcatnip@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      24
      ·
      1 year ago

      Whether you personally like it that way is irrelevant. It’s cosmetic surgery performed on people who cannot consent. You should oppose it for that reason alone.

    • starman2112@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      1 year ago

      Man idunno, I don’t have a problem with my dick (small as it may be), but it kinda bothers me that some doctor cut a piece of it off when I was a baby.

    • MrFagtron9000@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      How do you know you’re happy with it compared to not being circumcised?

      Wouldn’t it be amazing if the head of your dick had some sensitivity?

      • 🇰 🌀 🇱 🇦 🇳 🇦 🇰 ℹ️@yiffit.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        I’m circumcised and I have plenty of sensitivity in the head of my dick. How would someone who isn’t circumcised know how much or how little sensitivity a circumcised dick has? And if uncut dudes are even more sensitive than cut, do you all have problems with premature ejaculation? I can’t imagine being any more sensitive. I’d be creaming just from wearing underwear and moving my body.

        I’m not pro circumcision or anything, I’ve just always felt that the sensitivity thing is such a stupid, weak argument because in my experience of both being circumcised and also being pansexual and spending plenty of time around other dicks both cut and uncut, it’s bullshit.