• db2@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    212
    ·
    29 days ago

    Oh look, another reason not to buy BMW, I’ll just add it to the other 456788656752 reasons.

    • jonne@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      74
      ·
      29 days ago

      The problem is that once one manufacturer starts doing this, they’ll all do it, so you won’t even have the option of buying a new car without a subscription.

      • gh0stcassette
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        28 days ago

        I’m glad my current car is a 2015 Mazda. It’s recent enough to have a touch screen and Bluetooth, but not so recent that it’s got an LTE/5G radio that can phone home and let them sell my driving data to insurance companies or force subscription payments on me. When I get my next car in a decade or so, hopefully I can import a cheap Chinese EV that’s either easy to jailbreak, or doesn’t have any of that bullshit included.

        • unexposedhazard@discuss.tchncs.de
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          edit-2
          28 days ago

          Please do if possible.

          Seriously tho, was it so hard to understand that i was pointing out that all big car companies are starting to do this?

          If this is a reason not to buy a BMW then its a reason not to buy any modern car. Which it is imo.

          • db2@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            12
            ·
            28 days ago

            The problem is a huge number of cars were removed and destroyed which would otherwise have been in the used market. It’s a big reason why even used cars are priced so high. Buying used isn’t what it used to be.

            https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Car_Allowance_Rebate_System

            And they want to do it again not because it helped anyone get a car but because it let them make the prices so stupidly high.

            I agree that new cars suck but they’re removing the stocks of used cars that would be worth buying at any price and at our expense.

            • unexposedhazard@discuss.tchncs.de
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              8
              ·
              28 days ago

              Agree with that yep, its also already been shown years ago that modding used cars into electric cars is totally doable, economic and saves fuckloads of resources. Same thing happening with tractors too btw. Lots of farmers are buying up old tractors because they can actually repair them on site when they break down. With modern ones they have to wait for some asshole from john deer to come in with a debugging laptop to do the exact same thing for lots of money and downtime.

      • MisterFrog@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        28 days ago

        While this is completely true, it’s a bit tone-deaf. Fuck cars, but many people barely have a choice because their public transport consists of a handful of busses that come once an hour and nothing is close by.

        As an aside, I spend a whopping total of about $1/day (edit Australian $, so less USD) on maintenance and electricity for my electric cargo bike. I go about 17 km each way to work and the funny thing is it’s only about 10 mins longer than driving, lol

        • Blaster M@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          27 days ago

          Imagine a bus coming once an hour… try only twice a day for the entire county… early morning and late night.

          • MisterFrog@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            27 days ago

            💀 where is this?

            … Re-read before I sent. I thought this said country, lol.

            Yikes, why even have a bus at that point?

        • unexposedhazard@discuss.tchncs.de
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          28 days ago

          Yeah i know many people dont really have much of a choice, see the thread nex to your comment. I was more intending to talk shit about modern cars that all seem to have this shit.

    • iamanurd@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      27 days ago

      I love my bmw plug in hybrid. I don’t see myself ever paying for a subscription though. Maybe if it comes with pizza, but even then it’s unlikely.

  • golli@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    174
    ·
    29 days ago

    If once you do not succeed, just try again next year. They tried and backtracked putting heated seats behind a paywall not even a year ago see here.

    Unless laws are made to make this fundamentally illegal, they’ll just keep pushing until it sticks. And once one manufacturer succeeds, they’ll all follow.

    • Tautvydaxx@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      23
      ·
      28 days ago

      Since 2019 you have to pay 800$ a year to have your bmw use adaptive drive, 150$ to use the app.

  • Churbleyimyam@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    78
    ·
    28 days ago

    Well done BMW. Anything that leads to more people cycling instead of driving is a good thing in my book.

    • joenforcer@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      51
      ·
      28 days ago

      People won’t switch from driving to cycling over this. They’ll just pick one of the several dozen other car manufacturers.

      • blackn1ght@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        28 days ago

        I suspect most BMW owners won’t care too much. Like they’ll find it annoying but still buy/lease the car anyway.

        • wreckedcarzz@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          28 days ago

          If the bike does the biking completely for me, has hvac, reclining seats, can do 65mph down the highway and can take care of my morning wood taking into account remaining travel time, I’d be interested. That indeed would be a really good bike.

    • herrvogel@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      28 days ago

      Nobody’s gonna abandon cars as a whole over this, the same they wouldn’t abandon bicycles as a whole over some other outrageously monetized luxury feature they could live without.

    • jj4211@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      28 days ago

      Sorry, your bicycle’s gear selector is locked into a single gear until you pay your subscription for the other gears.

  • MehBlah@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    75
    ·
    28 days ago

    In theory most subscription services provide additional content as time goes on. This only provides a capability that already exists on the car.

    • curry@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      25
      ·
      28 days ago

      Scummy practices that should be outlawed, like retail stores raising prices just before a big sale so they can slap “80% off!” on their stuff.

      • Taalen@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        edit-2
        27 days ago

        EU is at least trying to do something about that. As of last year stores are required to display the cheapest price they’ve had for an item in the past three months when they have something on sale. Not all stores comply, and of course they try to get around these by the usual shenanigans, like basically the same product being available from the manufacturer with two slightly different item codes.

        Edit: I think I was mistaken, and it’s 30 days, not 3 months

    • Evrala@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      edit-2
      27 days ago

      Import something old and fun! Cars from smaller countries have lower mileage and can be cheap because they aren’t as valuable as a comparable car from the US. It isn’t hard to find a 25 year old car with about 50,000 miles on it.

      JDM cars are especially nice now because of how weak the YEN is. Look outside the popular JDM cars and there are tons of things with easy to find parts for dirt cheap.

      Or hell, get a not top trim of a popular model, and you can get something cheap. Want a station wagon built on the same platform as the Nissan Skyline? The Automatic Stageas are cheaper because tuners don’t want them because they’re an automatic and don’t have a turbo, which makes them slower, but also more reliable.

      Nissan Rasheens with the 1500cc engine are easy to maintain and have an engine that was used in some American cars, get the first true AWD CUV for about $5000 plus import fees.

      Another cheap option is a Toyota Caldina, get a reliable awd station wagon with a nice interior for 7 or 8 grand including import fees. (Avoid the 2000ish GTT version with a turbo, turbo manifold is prone to warping on that engine and said manifold is hard to find in the US as those engines generally didnt sell in the US)
      Edit: looks like Caldinas have gone up in price recently.

        • Evrala@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          edit-2
          28 days ago

          Carfromjapan.com has the best search features I’ve found, once you know what you’re looking for https://www.goo-net-exchange.com/ is also nice because they translate the car condition sheets.

          Parts availability depends on the car. For the Rasheen for example most of the engine parts can be found at any parts store for the 1500 and 2000 cc engine versions cause those engines were also in American cars though the 2000cc engine is far more common. I’ve also found English websites that are easy to order just about any parts you want for a Rasheen including body panels.

          Amazon is also nice for finding parts, I was able to find parts for a SR18DE engine on Amazon and that engine was never sold in America. So you can just buy the parts yourself then take the car to a local mechanic for the work.

          Once you find something that interests you just Google that car name parts and you can usually find someone talking online about how owning that car has been for them.

          The best listings also have video of the car running so you can hear if something is off with it.

        • dsco@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          27 days ago

          I used picknbuy24 to get a Nissan Tiida for $1200 USD with like 25k miles. Parts are normally the same as they are on already imported models.

          • kalpol@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            27 days ago

            How did Customs let it through? It has to have DOT spec stuff in the US. I don’t know about more than 25 years old.

      • SreudianFlip@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        28 days ago

        One of our cars is a 2016 GM and I just unscrewed the cell antenna instead of ripping out the cell module. Tracking disabled, or at least unreliable. The subscription nav is useless and easy to ignore. I would like to figure out how to prevent the siriusxm ads built into the infotainment system, still.

        I look forward to better infotainment hacks down the road.

    • N3Cr0@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      28 days ago

      Not necessarily. My 2015 SEAT (for folks in the North America: That’s basically Volkswagen) is one of the latest cars that do not completely fuck you over. TPMS is passive, so you don’t need expensive sensors. You can also update the maps on your own (OK, here they pull you over if you don’t know the simple trick). Parts are also cheap.

      • Gsus4@mander.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        edit-2
        28 days ago

        Are there any electric cars that aren’t glorified smartphones on wheels? Something a grandma can drive without ending up in the wrong menu.

        • spongebue@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          edit-2
          28 days ago

          The Bolt is ok. It has a screen and Android Auto and stuff, but I only use it for Android Auto navigation and energy stats when I’m curious. For pretty much everything else, there are good ol’ fashioned buttons.

          Oh, it does have OnStar and some stuff associated with that, but GM discontinued the worst of it after a class action lawsuit.

        • IphtashuFitz@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          28 days ago

          My wife used to drive an electric Smart Car for her work. It had a range of 60 miles (less in the winter), and she called it a glorified golf cart. But it was perfect for the 20 or so miles she’d drive each day.

    • BaronVonBort@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      23
      ·
      28 days ago

      Because the people who buy them have it and BMW can get more out of them. The real problem is that they’ll buy it, and other manufacturers will see “hey, it’s a successful model and additional revenue generation!”

  • Emerald@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    54
    ·
    28 days ago

    “The pressure eased off a little when they ended subscriptions tied to heated seats, but the Internet rage machine has come back for vengeance.”

    lol. It’s not vengeance or rage, its simply the fact that making someone pay for something they already own is dumb.

  • Sterile_Technique@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    51
    ·
    29 days ago

    You know it’s just a matter of time before this shit starts being applied to budget cars.

    …I really hope the tech crowd is working on jailbreaking this garbage.

    • barryamelton@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      27
      ·
      29 days ago

      We try. We also pivot to open source to try and regain control because it’s the only way. We even share our passions with those who ask.

      You folks just roll your eyes and put more money on their hands.

      • kautau@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        38
        ·
        29 days ago

        This “tech crowd” and “you folks” dichotomy is not helpful at all. Tell people how they can help, volunteer, donate etc, don’t wedge gaps between the same class fighting against the same ruling class. I’m a software engineer. I write open source software. I get that it’s tiring and you can see the worst in people when doing it, but we’re going to have to be better than that if we want to change things.

        And for those reading like the top commenter, don’t sit on your hands and wait for “tech folks” to figure stuff out. It’s us vs. corporate greed, not “us hoping the tech folks save us from corporate greed” or “us tech folks being badgered like we should be some saviors against corporate greed.” Write your representatives to tell them this isn’t ok. Be mindful in your selection when you purchase a vehicle. Ask your tech savvy friends and family what you can do to help. You aren’t helpless in this, and as OP said, just sitting and waiting for something to be fixed or changed doesn’t help the overall goal.

        • umbrella@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          edit-2
          28 days ago

          dismissing our warnings as some nerd turf wars for decades aint helping anyone either.

          no amount of talking to normies will fix this because you would rather listen to the corporations. and this precedes any form of action.

          • Pandemanium@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            28 days ago

            What exactly do you propose the “normies” do? Is there some non-corporation making road-worthy cars? No? Let me guess, you want a family of 5 to bike 2 hours to the nearest school/park/grocery store in the snow on rural roads with no shoulder just to avoid paying a corporation? Take the nonexistent train?

            • umbrella@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              edit-2
              27 days ago

              who suggested bikes?

              let me just say this: if facebook were known to be doing the shit it does today in 2002, it wouldnt have fucking flied, because normies trusted people more than they did corporations. throw away the notion we are powerless against corporations.

              no need to make up that huge strawman when you could have properly read what i bothered to type out.

        • barryamelton@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          28 days ago

          I wrote it as a tongue in cheek against the OP that said “…I really hope the tech crowd is working on jailbreaking this garbage”.

          Surprise surprise, that comment is sitting with 49 upvotes 1 downvote, mine that you admonish is on 27 upvotes 13 downvotes.

          This kind of proves the point. The “tech crowd” doesn’t owe you anything. Sterile_Technique@lemmy.world, you don’t know how much of my personal and professional life I have spent fully on open source.

          Get up your feet and talk with your family, representatitives. Legislate this shit away. Nobody accepts food products that dont have a recipe or with unknown ingredients. Nobody accepts engineering projects without plans. Demand open source and interoperability.

    • Ilovethebomb@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      29 days ago

      That would be the ultimate way to stop this. Let them put the hardware in, and then not make a cent off it, because a third party enables it for the customer.

  • michaelmrose@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    46
    ·
    28 days ago

    Why is this bad in a nutshell.

    A) The only way to control access to this feature is to lock down and phone home. If it doesn’t phone home then when someone figures out a way around your present security its possible for someone to sell said features forever. Such DRM could hurt repeatability by accident or more likely on purpose.

    B) There is no reason to fail open so even if BMW is still chugging when they stop taking your cars phone calls and retires those servers you get no more feature.

    C) The amount spent over the lifespan of a car wherein people opt to take care of their valuable asset absolutely dwarfs the cost able to be extracted up front

    D) This functionality opens the door to a hacker not just turning off your features but turning off your car. This includes state sponsored attackers and people who are just generally pissed off at the geopolitical actions of your country of origin. If you are in the US that is a lot of fucking people.

    E) Product segmentation on average increases the amount you can extract per user. Allowing segmentation by features turn on or off in software by the month it allows far greater segmentation with no reasonable expectation that the baseline will be lower. This means the lowest end user of a model pays the same for even less. The median user pays somewhat more and the max user pays a LOT more.

    F) This means wholly paid for used cars now come with a car payment to the manufacturer.

    Now there are half a hundred people on the boards of these companies and 338M of us in the US. 449M in the EU. There is no reason to allow this misfeature to continue to be a thing in our markets. If automakers don’t like those restrictions any one of them can opt to most of the most valuable markets in the world and find their fortunes exclusively in China while their competitors eat their former marketshare.

    • Semi-Hemi-Lemmygod@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      27 days ago

      Forgot one that was mentioned up-thread, which was that even if you don’t pay for the fancy suspension you will still have to pay for fancy suspension parts if they break.

    • ILikeBoobies@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      28 days ago

      C and e don’t sound like bad things

      At least not bad enough for the company not to do it

      • michaelmrose@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        28 days ago

        All of it is a reason for people to vote not to allow it. This can be accomplished federally or via initiatives in states. If a handful states comprising 30-50% of the pop wont allow it then it will be dead.

            • ILikeBoobies@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              26 days ago

              Forcing the company to be liable for the data they collect would be more likely to stop them from doing it than trying to outlaw them collecting it

              • michaelmrose@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                26 days ago

                No it wouldn’t because poor people can trivially be kept out of court all kinds of ways from binding arbitration to half assed enforcement. As a rule if you want someone to NOT do something you have to tell them they can’t do it!

                • ILikeBoobies@lemmy.ca
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  25 days ago

                  No it wouldn’t because elected officials don’t represent poor people

                  But we’re talking about buying new BMWs anyway. Your logic was just too stupid to not laugh at

  • Obinice@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    43
    ·
    29 days ago

    In what way does the suspension require regular servicing or an online connection to a server to function? That would be the only reason to offer it as an ongoing service cost.

    Otherwise, you’re just paying extra for something already in your car, not for an actual service, which would make no sense?

    What next, paint ongoing service fees for having wheels? Not even for ensuring they’re regularly replaced, serviced, or repaired, just for the ability to use them at all…

    • Michal@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      39
      ·
      28 days ago

      Active suspension is software, just like Photoshop is. You need to pay subscription fee for Photoshop now, and BMW wants a subscription fee for their active suspension software too. Rent seeking and Enshittification.

      • DudeDudenson@lemmings.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        14
        ·
        edit-2
        28 days ago

        Except that you have to have special way more expensive shocks to have adaptive suspension compared to fixed. It’s like being sold an I3 CPU for the price of an I9 cpu while being told you can pay a subscription to upgrade to the full performance

        • mangaskahn@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          edit-2
          28 days ago

          I feel like in this case it’s more like everyone gets sold i9 hardware, but can choose to pay the i3 price for it with locked out features, then decide later to pay the subscription to unlock the i7 or i9 performance. It has advantages for the manufacturer in that there are fewer options to account for at build time and additional revenue later on. I still think it’s a terrible model that should be summarily rejected by customers, but I see why they are trying it.

          • DudeDudenson@lemmings.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            28 days ago

            Yeah they’re totally not charging you for the expensive suspension they’re installing in your car in the hopes that you’ll pay a subscription to use it. 100% not included in the price, clearly no one would ever do that

          • Hacksaw@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            28 days ago

            Nobody is giving away i9 hardware at i3 prices otherwise everyone would buy the cheapest model and part it out for massive profit.

      • jj4211@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        28 days ago

        At least with Photoshop (as bad as the model is), at least they are actually running the software and storing and backing up the associated data for it.

        With the car, it’s all local to the car without BMW having to incur any expense for that functionality to keep going.

    • exocortex@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      18
      ·
      edit-2
      28 days ago

      We long left the era where we “own” things that we buy. As everything is a computer now it has become very simple to control stuff that remotely that was working on its own before.

      So the answer to “why would <CORPORATION> do this” is simply: “Because they can”.

      Every tiny decision is guided by increasing profit. No matter the side effects (short or long term ). Because with many shareholders administering pressure to maximize profits there’s only one way to go (even if it’s a dumb and shortsighted decision) maximizing profits NOW. If you are not doing that because you can see that increasing profits now will hurt profits in the future then you are hindering the project. You have to increase profits now, because if you are not then your competitor is doing it and that is a problem. If you are not going with the project you will be out of a job sooner or later. Then someone will take over that will make the decision you couldn’t do.

      This is a race to the bottom. Morals, integrity, honesty, responsibility and foresight are only obstacles in this logic (because the competition is not bound by them which gains them an advantage).

      It’s simply cheaper now to build everything in the car always and run an operating system that manages all these things and can control what you are doing in your car.

      Cory Doctorow held a great keynote about this some ~10-ish years (?) ago with the title “The coming war on general computation” where he explained the side effects of putting DRM in every stupid appliance. The side effect here is that we cannot hack our cars to switch on the heated seats (or whatever other feature BMW is not allowing us to use for free) because of DRM. It is not “our” car, even though we bought it.

      • DelightfullyDivisive@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        28 days ago

        This is a side effect of deregulation of both corporations and the stock market. I think that we’re going to see the pendulum swing towards more regulation and consumer-friendly policies here in the US. I don’t see that lasting for the long-term, though. There are too many vulnerabilities in the political system that allow asshole billionaires to manipulate it.

        • orrk@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          28 days ago

          it’s not the system that is the problem, it’s the lack of class consciousness, in America the rich have it, but not the working class

      • Got_Bent@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        28 days ago

        I didn’t wake up this morning with the knowledge that I’m about to move to Pennsylvania and convert to being Amish.

  • N0body@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    40
    ·
    29 days ago

    “We’re pivoting from serving peasants to fleecing rich dumbasses that subscribe and pay monthly fees for features built into the car.”

    And they’ll make money doing it. Because there will never be a shortage of people with more money than sense.

    • acosmichippo@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      edit-2
      29 days ago

      eh, rich people car shop as well, and there is plenty of competition in that market. of course some people will still opt for BMW, we just have to hope enough go elsewhere to make them lose marketshare. but… it’s not looking good so far.

      • shani66@ani.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        28 days ago

        Ngl, i don’t see how bmw gets any sales when Mercedes exists. If you are actually rich a Mercedes is almost objectively the better vehicle, if you are just trying to show off the Mercedes is a better status symbol too.

  • FireWire400@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    36
    ·
    edit-2
    28 days ago

    They tried this with heated seats and no one wanted it, what made them think would we accept this?

    German car makers have become such a joke in the last decade…