As students return to college campuses across the United States, administrators are bracing for a resurgence in activism against the war in Gaza.

    • chiliedogg@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      100
      ·
      1 month ago

      In Texas, it’s actually illegal for a government entity to do business with a company that boycotts Israel. Calls for divestment at UT and other schools can’t legally be given any consideration because of our fucked-up state government.

      Like: when I evaluate bids for the City, one of the sections I have to fill out by law relates to the bidder’s stance on the Israeli government. It’s insane.

      • Hexbatch@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        27
        ·
        1 month ago

        Also from Texas, this has been driving me crazy for years. At least they are now against international law now. Cold comfort

        • chiliedogg@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          12
          ·
          edit-2
          30 days ago

          Yes and no.

          It’s technically a restriction on government, which makes it legally trickier despite being blatantly against the spirit of the first amendment.

          • barsquid@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            14
            ·
            30 days ago

            “Rejecting the bid isn’t prosecution,” that’s some bullshit. Yeah it is against the spirit for sure.

            • chiliedogg@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              5
              ·
              29 days ago

              It’s establishing a state minimum RFB. Just like requiring streets to be designed by PEs limits bidding option from those who are perfectly capable of the job from bidding because they lack the stamp.

              So they’re being eliminated for not meeting qualifications, not for their speech. Furthermore, they’re usually eliminated from consideration by municipal, county, and school governments, who didn’t write the rule. So the body that wrote the rule (state) isn’t perecuting companies directly.

              It creates difficulty in establishing standing to sue. It’s the state’s rule that limits the authority of the cities, so the anti-Israel companies have no standing to sue the state. But the cities also can’t sue the state because they can’t show damages caused by the discrimination since there’s a thousand other bidders who can do the job.

              The assholes in the Texas legislature specialize in drafting discriminatory laws that are difficult to challenge in court.

        • ...m...@ttrpg.network
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          edit-2
          30 days ago

          …i do a lot of work with texas municipalities and universities and all their standard contracts include a section forbidding us or any of our subconsultants from boycotting israel…

    • AItoothbrush@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      1 month ago

      Look. im from europe and even us havent figured that out(even in the not genocidal countries) but at least we dont send them money and weapons for FREE. At least our countries sell the weapons to genocidal countries.

      • Senokir@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        31
        ·
        1 month ago

        While the comment that you are replying to does lack nuance, the intent is clear. There is obviously a difference between murder and self defense.

      • toiletobserver@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        1 month ago

        You can support with food, medicine, and infrastructure. If we believe in killing something so dearly, we can send our own people. Harder to be a war monger if your own ass is on the line.

        • chonglibloodsport@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          14
          ·
          1 month ago

          Some of the biggest supporters of Ukraine are its neighbours in Europe. I think they have a good reason to believe that if Ukraine fell they’d be next.

  • Queue
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    72
    ·
    30 days ago

    Revoking the right to question the war, that’s awesome. It’s cool to violate 1st Amendment rights when the good guys do it!

    • TallonMetroid@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      30 days ago

      1st Amendment only applies to the government. Unless these university admins are also members of government and acting in their capacity as such, then as shitty a move as this is, it’s not actually a 1st Amendment violation.

      • HenchmanNumber3@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        28
        ·
        30 days ago

        Some of the universities mentioned in the article are public institutions. SCOTUS held in Healy v James that the 1st Amendment applies to public universities. So some of the actions could be considered 1st Amendment violations.

      • orrk@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        19
        ·
        30 days ago

        Fun fact, the 1st amendment also applies to any organization or persons receiving money from the government (without it just being through sales ofc)

      • Queue
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        29 days ago

        “It’s not illegal so that makes it cool.”

        I personally find the ides that if you want an eduction, which is required for modern living, you need to abandon your rights as a citizen. Mandatary and needed public goods shouldn’t strip you of your mandatory and needed rights.

        Students have their rights stripped, especially as a child, because some Karens and Kevins didn’t want to be a member of the HOA, they wanted to be a school board member.

        Bags searched and confiscated, protests shut down, students having harmless objects taken away out of a nebulous fear of “could maybe do somethig in the future”.

        • Drivebyhaiku@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          29 days ago

          I wouldn’t say that’s the sentiment expressed when people remind others of the limitations of freedom of speech. More like it’s a reminder that knowing exactly where those boundaries lie because somethings aren’t the government’s job to mediate. Sometimes it’s our collective job to resist because nobody is coming to fix it for you.

          Realistically rights like the freedom of speech and expression are notoriously weak by way of actual protection by a culture. Russia technically has freedom of speech on the books but you can still be hauled off to prison for spreading “LGBTQIA propaganda”. What actually protects those rights are the expectations and moreover the outrage of a culture’s people against these acts of censorship regardless of who is perpetuating it.

    • SSJMarx@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      29 days ago

      We’ve been violating the First Amendment for about as long as we’ve had it. Our other felon presidential candidate ran from jail after being imprisoned for speaking out about World War 1 (which is a lot cooler than what the current one did).

      • Queue
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        29 days ago

        Eugene V. Debs should have won every time, I have yet to see a bad take he had. He was anti-racist, feminist, and wanted to increase the right to vote to all Americans.

      • Queue
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        29 days ago

        The people pretending to educate citizens, then denying the citizens educating each other.

        The people pretending that war is good when Your Favorite Team does it.

        The people that act like murder is actually a complex issue.

  • whotookkarl@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    65
    ·
    30 days ago

    Because removing people’s ability to peacefully protest and demonstrate has gone so well in the past and not escalated to less peaceful activity. /s

  • michaelmrose@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    29 days ago

    signs cannot be displayed on university property without prior approval.

    Fuck No

    limits on the use of amplified sound

    Fuck YES

  • Hexbatch@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    1 month ago

    The only thing that can stop an absolute mess on campuses is a cease fire that allows in food and medicine .

    These rules are from hopeful admins this week

    • ripcord@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      30 days ago

      I know this source is garbage/useless because it rates the AP and The Verge exactly the same.