• lath@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    85
    ·
    4 months ago

    Truth is sculpting body hair was taking too much time and production couldn’t keep up with demand, so management decided to cut costs and keep it smooth.

    • Zorsith
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      23
      ·
      4 months ago

      I feel like it might’ve been painted on for greek-style marble statues? Still unusual for paintings

    • PrimeMinisterKeyes@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      edit-2
      4 months ago

      Men were depicted with pubes, though. See the article, too.
      A female friend of mine actually did her bachelor’s thesis on body hair removal across certain cultures and time periods. Fun discussions were had.
      Short version, body hair removal on both women and men has been around for a very long time and is subject to changes. Depictions of nude bodies follow somewhat different rules, though. If they are at all permissible, that is.

  • smeg@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    57
    ·
    4 months ago

    One medieval writer even went as far as to claim that if you take the hairs of a menstruating woman and bury them in the garden, a snake will grow from the earth. (If any of our dear readers try this at home, please write in to the ABC with your results).

  • Fleur__@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    4 months ago

    Believe it or not there is actually no shortage of art containing women’s pubic hair if you just google it

  • Nurgus@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    4 months ago

    One thing the article doesn’t consider is age. What if the ancient artists were intending their subjects to be younger girls than the actual models?

    “Youth” in women being idealised then as now, presumably. I don’t imagine they had the same issues with girls being under age as we do.

  • pseudo@jlai.lu
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    4 months ago

    That question work for both gender and the answer is, it depens on which artistic mouvment. “La liberté guidant le peuple” is famous the have a bit of armpit hair and “l’origine du monde” while been painting with the clear purpose to choc the public is much hairy.

    I never thought restoration have got rid of the hair. If nudity chock you, would you not rather dress people than shaving them? Anyway, restoration even get rid of whole people just because their were not white so…

  • gencha@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    4 months ago

    I feel like I’ve seen plenty of bush in the galleries. Will have to take a closer look in the future