Ok, what I’m saying is, I think it’s easy to read your statement as doing that. I know it’s not what you mean, but it’s good to be mindful of how your statements may be interpreted so that we don’t unintentionally harm our own friends. Textual ambiguity and all that.
There’s gonna be a debate? I would probably enjoy a VP debate the most.
Walz has already agreed to one on I believe October 1st. CBS maybe? Just waiting on Weird couch fucking, cross dressing Vance
Are we sure we want to paint crossdressing in a negative light? I know they hate it, but it’s kind of friendly fire, no?
Hypocrisy. We are painting hypocrisy in a negative light
True. I just don’t want to associate crossdressing with “bad weird”.
We don’t. They do. That simple
Ok, what I’m saying is, I think it’s easy to read your statement as doing that. I know it’s not what you mean, but it’s good to be mindful of how your statements may be interpreted so that we don’t unintentionally harm our own friends. Textual ambiguity and all that.
I’m a cross dresser and I was not offended.
Neat, thanks
All my homies weird
No, you’re painting crossdressing in a negative light and you should do better.
We should probably call hold a cross dressing drag-phobe.
Cool collected old neighbour schooling and ridiculing the weird asshole?
Yeah, this might be delicious. But it is seriously worrying that this is supposed to be a debate and a political reality.
No debates can also make sense. No maga-brained person is flipping their vote because of a debate.