• Jarix@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    24
    ·
    edit-2
    4 months ago

    Intel pushing into the gpu space is so obviously them trying to get the public to R&D AI hardware since Nvidia is so far ahead of everyone in that game.

    It would be great if they accidentally did some good, but it’s not something they are going to keep getting better at.

    A Linux optimized GPU would be an interesting product, even if its still just R&D for an entirely different goal

    • DarkThoughts@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      4 months ago

      Ironically a field where AMD sucks at too. Though, there has been some good progress & fixes with ROCm recently. I don’t mind a win / win situation between Intel & consumers though. The gpu market is seriously fucked for quite a while now and some more competition would really help.

      • eatCasserole@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        4 months ago

        I’m skeptical about how much another competitor would help…if intel can offer a comparable product, they’ll get right in on the price gouging too. Why wouldn’t they?

        • DarkThoughts@fedia.io
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          4 months ago

          Because Intel is in a position where they would need to increase their market share first and foremost. They would not have any sort of benefit from offering overpriced GPUs that no one wants to buy.

          • eatCasserole@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            4 months ago

            So they’re either in the “no one wants to buy” situation, with a product that doesn’t quite measure up and a lower price is the incentive to buy, or they reach parity with AMD, and bring the price up to match as well.

            Maybe there is a window in between where they’re sacrificing some profit to grow their market share, and regular customers benefit, but I have 0 faith in this economic system.

  • darkfiremp3@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    4 months ago

    I’m excited for more competition, and someone not making $4000 cards; at the same time, being slower than a 3070 ti…

  • RedstoneValley@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    4 months ago

    Serious question: Was there ever an intel GPU which could be used to play 3d graphics intensive games? The only chips I came across so far were woefully underperforming laptop chips with fancy names.

    • Dudewitbow@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      4 months ago

      arc A750/770 was ~AMD RX 6600/XT or Nvidia 3050/3060 performance, just with (significantly) worse drivers where whether a game would run properly was a flip of a coin

    • scutiger@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      4 months ago

      The Arc 7 series GPUs were aimed at gaming. They didn’t generally perform on par with the competition, and there were driver issues at launch. IIRC they just couldn’t run anything DirectX 9 or older, but performed ok on newer games.

      I don’t know what the status on them is like now.

      • UnpledgedCatnapTipper
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        4 months ago

        Their driver support supposedly has gotten a lot better, but I can’t confirm myself. I did get their cheap a380 for an encoder card for my Jellyfin server because it’s pretty much the cheapest offering with an AV1 hardware encoder. It’s working great for that so far.

  • auzy@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    4 months ago

    After screwing over all the CPU owners, I can safely say I’ll pass…

    They don’t seem to be taking the CPU fixing seriously