my unpopular opinion is that they are a waste of time and effort.

  • Biezelbob@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    91
    ·
    1 month ago

    wasting time on something you enjoy is not actually wasted time. Besides, so many people get positivity from watching etc

  • Harvey656@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    67
    ·
    1 month ago

    Honestly, not to be mean or anything, BUT, this sorta reeks of “I don’t like it so nobody else should.”

    This is a type of mentality that I believe to be highly negative and frankly kinda toxic. Your welcome to your opinion, but I really don’t think the many many hours, days, weeks, months, and years of effort, training and planning that goes into those who both run and participate in the Olympics is a waste of time and effort.

    Also we live in a world that you can just block or ignore anything you don’t particularly care for.

    • Kecessa@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      edit-2
      1 month ago

      They all have their world championships already so they can already compete there (and I mean, that’s exactly what a multitude of sports do in fact, hell, climbers weren’t that happy about how the sport was added to the Olympics and some high ranking competitors just didn’t bother even trying to go).

      The environmental and socioeconomic impact of the Olympics make them something we really should consider at least making permanently held in a specific location.

      • chiliedogg@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        1 month ago

        The Olympics is a time to celebrate athletes in sports we don’t follow every day.

        I don’t watch baseball, soccer, basketball, etc at the Olympics because they all get plenty of air time.

        In the last week I watched water polo, gymnastics, breakdancing, volleyball, skateboarding, and more.

        There’s an event (modern pentathlon) that consists of pistol shooting, fencing, Horsemanship, running, and swimming. That’s a fascinating mix of disciplines and there are people who train for decades to be good at it, and I think it’s wonderful that they get their time in the spotlight every few years.

      • Harvey656@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 month ago

        Hmm, an interesting take. The Olympics, being an international multinational event, being in a singular location could cause political tension between countries. It would have to be on neutral land for such a thing to work. Maybe some of that unclaimed land In Africa?

        Edit: messed up the formatting by accident.

        • Kecessa@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 month ago

          That would mean a private company becoming the owner of land that isn’t part of a country, would be kind of weird wouldn’t it?

          They’re already registered in Switzerland so let them deal with it, countries should refuse to host them considering the cost and the fact that there’s no return on investment in the end.

          • Harvey656@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 month ago

            I mean that could work from my American perspective, I’m unsure about other parts of the world. Perhaps we shouldn’t care about those sort of silly high school level drama between nations? I don’t think I have enough understanding to know. But Switzerland is pretty so I’m down with it.

    • SkyNTP@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      1 month ago

      “…so nobody else should”

      I don’t think OP ever said that, nor did they imply it. I interpret OP’s unpopular opinion as nothing more than “it’s not for me”.

      But I guess there is some room for ambiguity.

      • petrol_sniff_king
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        1 month ago

        Sure, but plenty of things I don’t like I still wouldn’t call a waste of time and effort.

    • AA5B@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 month ago

      Also, if there’s any vision, aspiration for better, hope for improvement, expanding the limits of the human body is important, just as aspiring to ever improving science or technology

    • Trainguyrom@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 month ago

      Honestly, not to be mean or anything, BUT, this sorta reeks of “I don’t like it so nobody else should.”

      As someone who had to learn how to avoid these feelings after growing up with parents who felt this way about everything, OP is clearly just salty that people like something they don’t like.

      There are legitimate problems with the Olympics, and the scale of the spectacle, international attention and amount of people and money involved really lends itself to the worst of modern humanity. But that doesn’t mean nobody can enjoy them, that just means that the world needs to push to improve the Olympics further

  • Mellow@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    37
    ·
    edit-2
    1 month ago

    I believe there is a lot of positive reasons to have the Olympics. It’s a symbol of peace. Nations joining together in the spirit of competition to send their best athletes to compete. Culture is shared. Cities hosting it put their best foot forward. Everyone comes together.

    As far as the negatives. The amount of money and work required to host is getting out of hand. They should seriously pair back the amount of competitions. I just freaking watched break dancing. Seriously? Dressage? Should we just cut to the chase and award medals to the horses? Maybe we stick to athletic human sports and drop some of the frivolity, or artistic endeavors where judges are required to decide style points when a stopwatch or a tape measure should do. The sheer amount of resources required to support this bloating competition has gotten out of hand.

    • Hegar@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      26
      ·
      1 month ago

      Nations joining together in the spirit of the rich lording it over everyone else, I think you mean? Or the spirit of sport-washing dictatorships, maybe?

    • Wild Bill@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      1 month ago

      Well now… break dancing was actually pretty fun to watch, in my opinion. Perfect balance between rhythmic gymnastics and dance.

    • Kecessa@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 month ago

      The fact that the Olympics committee doesn’t answer to anyone and it’s rolling in cash is reason enough to cancel them.

    • OhShitSon@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 month ago

      Have ever tried riding a horse? Dressage is not just the horse, it’s exhausting for the rider as well.

  • mycodesucks@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    23
    ·
    1 month ago

    For the athletes, it’s a not a waste of time and effort.

    For the hosting countries/cities?

    They cost a TON of time and money, and it’s a dubious proposition that the host cities ever recover that investment. Olympic villages are also rarely the best possible use of prime land, and often involve buying up and gentrifying entire neighborhoods for the purpose of building the facilities, and for the duration of the event, and the planning leading up to it, your city basically gives up autonomy to an organization that spends your resources as if they were their own in order to create a platform to sell advertising rights in the guise of sportsmanship. For the Olympics to be more sustainable and less corrupted by commercial interests, they should focus less on spectacle and expenditure and rely more on existing infrastructure.

    Furthermore, while sport is an important and noble endeavor, it is by no means any more important than any other human endeavor, and every four years we have to be exposed to the intersection of sports and politics in discussions about nations that, for example, allow medalists to avoid conscription or escape poverty in various countries in exchange for bringing national prestige, and rarely do we take the opportunity to discuss what this says about our priorities, simply accepting the elevated prestige we place on this particular sporting event without question.

    In short, I don’t agree their cancellation would cause NOTHING of value to be lost, but the Olympics as an event in its current incarnation has PLENTY worth reevaluating, and we could all benefit greatly from reexamining its scale and role.

  • Hegar@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    edit-2
    1 month ago

    It’s a drain on resources intended to boost the prestige of a nation-state and the vile, self-serving elites that control them. The IOC itself is a corrupt bribe-machine that willingly bolsters the reputation of the worst regimes in the world.

    It’s the circuses part of ‘bread and circuses’ - a tool of oppressers the world over.

    It’s not even a fair competition. How rich a country is and how much they spend on sport and sport science is the largest determining factor in medal count. Just another way for the evil to buy legitimacy.

    • orcrist@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 month ago

      There are no fair competitions. That bar is impossible to achieve. You can only create rules to make certain aspects fair. It will always be true that some athletes and teams are coming in with obvious advantages, no matter what anyone tries. And that’s kind of the point, right? It’s the best in the world, and the best are not distributed evenly for a variety of economic and cultural and demographic reasons.

  • takeda@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    1 month ago

    my unpopular opinion is that they are a waste of time and effort.

    Let’s go further and remove Soccer, American Football, Basketball, Hockey and other sports.

    All of that is IMO a waste of time, with no value /s

    • corroded@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      1 month ago

      We really should. Sports aren’t only a waste of time, they’re a waste of money, too. It infuriates me that taxpayer money is used to build stadiums.

      • Apytele@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        1 month ago

        The modern concept of spectacle supports is a waste, not sport itself. As a psych nurse I wish a lot more people would do sports, especially team ones for the social aspect. The best exercise is one that brings you joy; making people run on treadmills to keep their hearts and muscles functioning isn’t even one of my preferred dystopias to live in. I’m not even fundamentally against spectator sports in and of themselves; just the modern commercialization and the way universities in particular have essentially become sports franchises with side hustles in education. I even enjoy watching the artistry and human physical prowess in the Olympics. But again the issue to me is the commercialization. Capitalism has taken so much from us and to me reclamation is more important than elimination in most if not all contexts.

    • BruceTwarzen@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      1 month ago

      What’s the /s for? Watching millionaires play with a ball to make corrupt rich assholes even richer is dumb as fuck

    • bluGill@kbin.run
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 month ago

      For the athlets they are evercise andethus of value I don’t understand why you would watch someone exercise though. Much better to watch someone play mandolin…

      • Skua@kbin.earth
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 month ago

        Because it’s generally fun to watch people be really good at stuff. The competition aspect of it creates stories that people get invested in too

  • arthurpizza@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    1 month ago

    LA’s transit plans are all aiming for a 2028 Olympics launch. If it was not for that, I doubt any of these projects could get the funding in time.

    • Kecessa@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 month ago

      And people should be fucking angry about it instead of being happy that it will get done for tourists instead of the residents, just like the cleanup of the Seine that should have been done decades ago.

  • Infynis@midwest.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    edit-2
    1 month ago

    There are many reasons to oppose the Olympics, but that the athletes are wasting their time and effort is not one of them

    Upvoted because this is definitely an unpopular opinion

  • Bobmighty@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    1 month ago

    I love the idea of the Olympics and would like to see a version that wasn’t an environmental, economic, and humanitarian trash fire.

  • jerkface@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    edit-2
    1 month ago

    It’s not that they are merely a waste of time. They are harmful. This is not what amateur sports should look like! I think everyone kind of realizes that. This is a bunch of bullshit nationalism and capitalism exploiting athletes and their fans. We would not lose amateur sports if the Olympic organization went bankrupt.

    • VirtualOdour@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      1 month ago

      Yeah I think they’re hurtful to the idea of sport and recreation, school becomes a filter to.find people willing to devote their life to minmaxing a natural talent which is a detriment to the very almost 100% of people who won’t be a top tier competitor.

      Whats the point of obsessing over records that no one else can get close to because it requires total dedication to training, diet, medicated living, and endless other stuff that just takes away from normal life? It creates a situation where you’re either only an athlete or you’re not at all an athlete, for most people it’s off-putting.

      We should focus on things that normal people can participate in without having to become totally specialized tools of rich corporations or national tools. Instead of instilling in people the idea that participation is only for elites why not reiterate the importance of a community and having fun? Instead of obsessive competition why not working together despite differences?

  • Rentlar@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    edit-2
    1 month ago

    Sometimes I feel this way too, most of the competitions don’t interest me much.

    One benefit that does happen is it spurs mass public transit expansion (Peertube version) big time in the host city. The sheer volume of athletes and visitors to one area means that your usual 1 hour or more commutes on already congested roads aren’t going to cut it.

    This event makes a city/country get off their ass, stop being complacent. It makes a convincing case for deficit spending to meet public infrastructure needs, which are so often neglected when left alone.

    • jerkface@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      edit-2
      1 month ago

      It makes the public go into massive debt for the benefit of corporations who make bank. It leaves the city with a dozen world-class sports venues that will never ever be used to their capacity again and which the host city will be unable to maintain, but which they paid for with public money.

      • Rentlar@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 month ago

        What you’re saying is true, there is definitely corruption, useless building and parking and unequal wealth transfer that happens with the Games in its host cities.

        However, my point is that there is a subset of that built infrastructure that does eventually see its capacity realized again, and that’s mass public transit. It’s easy to see the value of that infrastructure in hindsight, but many politicians and residents are skiddish about making the short and long term investments needed to provide transportation services and meet future movement needs of a population. The Olympics provide a guarantee that the infrastructure will be used even for just a few weeks, which help quell fears that the transit spending would be wasted money. Seeing that we still benefit from transit infrastructure built for that short event, should make people see that transit investment is valuable for all of us.

  • PhlubbaDubba@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    1 month ago

    I’d agree except that the possibility remains to just build a permanent site to host both the summer and winter games, removing like 99% of the negatives that it actually causes.