• jordanlund@lemmy.worldM
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    3 months ago

    First, he had no business with an AR-15 because he wasn’t old enough, but no, it wasn’t his business he was protecting, he was not and is not a business owner.

    • TheFonz@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      3 months ago

      I agree. The way they struck that gun charge on the WI law technicality was garbage and he shouldn’t have been near any guns.

      On the business thing: I agree. As an outsider looking in, seeing an employee going to defend a place of work is odd. But then again, I didn’t grow up in small town America so I’m not too familiar with the sense of community and kinship in those areas. I have no idea. All I can think of is where I live in small towns me have pretty close bonds and try to look out for each other.

      I do think your take is reasonable and there isn’t much for me to disagree with.