The statue commemorating Anne Frank, one of the most famous victims of the Holocaust, was defaced with pro-Palestinian graffiti for the second time on Sunday.

The statue is located in Merwedeplein, near the Anne Frank House in Amsterdam.

According to images published on X, the base of the statue was spray-painted with the slogan “Free Gaza” while the girl’s hands were painted with the same red color, AFP reported.

  • Madison420@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    edit-2
    4 months ago

    It’s to make a statement and draw attention, protest is supposed to make you upset. That’s just how life works.

    Ed:

    About the letters, Otto wrote: ‘I often end my letters by writing: “I hope that Anne’s book will impact the rest of your life so that insofar as it is possible in your own circumstances, you will work for unity and peace.”’

    Otto died on 19 August 1980. Shortly before his death, he said in an interview: ‘I am almost ninety now and my strength is slowly fading. But the mission that Anne passed on, keeps giving me new strength - to fight for ,reconciliation and for human rights across the world.’

    Ie. Make the disrespect of Mrs Frank and her family visible by defacing a statue of her the same way Israel defaces Jewish history and legacy.

    • zaph@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      4 months ago

      I get where you’re coming from but all this is going to do is fuel the fire under people who think support for Palestine is hate for the Jewish community as a whole.

        • zaph@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          4 months ago

          And if his walks included racist undertones those complaints would have been valid. Your rebuttal could be used against literally anything. The Oklahoma bombings were done in protest to Waco and other shit. You going to defend that protest because i think it was extremist and say it’s not the right way to protest? There’s a line and using MLK to justify crossing it is disgusting.

          • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            edit-2
            4 months ago

            And if his walks included racist undertones those complaints would have been valid.

            American white nationalists regularly insisted they did and claimed that they were being victimized by angry black mobs.

            Subsequent efforts by Hoover’s FBI during the COINTELPRO operation aimed at black civil rights leaders attempted to stock those fears and legitimize them with fabricated evidence in support of the claim.

            • DMBFFF@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              edit-2
              4 months ago

              American white nationalists regularly insisted they did and claimed that they were being victimized by angry black mobs.

              They aren’t credible.

              Subsequent efforts by Hoover’s FBI during the COINTELPRO operation aimed at black civil rights leaders attempted to stock those fears and legitimize them with fabricated evidence in support of the claim.

              Are you saying the person who did the defacing is an agent of the Israeli government?

              • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                4 months ago

                They aren’t credible.

                In the 1950s and 60s, they were considered extremely credible.

                Are you saying the person who did the defacing is an agent of the Israeli government?

                No more than I am suggesting J. Edgar Hoover was Jewish.

                • DMBFFF@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  4 months ago

                  In the 1950s and 60s, they were considered extremely credible.

                  I don’t think so.

                  No more than I am suggesting J. Edgar Hoover was Jewish.

                  or the Mossad infiltrated black groups in the US, I suppose. 😏

                  • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    ·
                    4 months ago

                    I don’t think so.

                    Shrug George Wallace was a governor for multiple terms. Strom Thurmond was a senator for decades. Nixon won the South on racism.

                    Mossad infiltrated black groups in the US

                    Black radical groups tended to align with Islam, particularly later into the 60s, 70s, and 80s.

            • zaph@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              4 months ago

              Yes that is my point. He wasn’t doing actual racist shit so they had to make stuff up. Genociders won’t have that problem here.

              • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                4 months ago

                He wasn’t doing actual racist shit so they had to make stuff up.

                And large numbers of White Americans believed it, because they were primed to assume colored people were monsters.

                Genociders won’t have that problem here.

                Stocking the hate towards Arabs is a pivotal part of the war effort against Gaza.

                • zaph@sh.itjust.works
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  3
                  ·
                  4 months ago

                  Stocking the hate towards Arabs is a pivotal part of the war effort against Gaza.

                  And, in my opinion, spray painting “free gaza” on a statue depicting a jewish teenager who died in the holocaust is only going to help them have something to point at and say “see, we’re right”

                  • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    ·
                    edit-2
                    4 months ago

                    If you look at a Holocaust victim’s memorial tagged with a condemnation of another Holocaust, and you think you yourself “Arab people deserve to be exterminated”…

          • Madison420@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            4 months ago

            Calling it anti semitic is my definition making it racial, I didn’t do that.

            That’s correct, it wasn’t an effective protest because it didn’t get the change he wanted but did put his word out there, right here today I could get that manifesto in less than 30 seconds.

            I don’t think anyone is supporting violence like a bombing, this is literal paint. Calm down, they aren’t comparable at all.

            • zaph@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              4 months ago

              It may not be the same as a bombing but the people whose minds they’re trying to change are only going to close further because they don’t want to be seen as supporting anti-semitism. Which when you’re defacing a jewish child’s statue seems like a not so far off stretch.

              • Madison420@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                4 months ago

                It’s not at all the same thing, you’re being bombastic about stupid shit.

                Defacing a genocide victims statue to bring light to an active genocide committed by members of her religion, famously mass victims of genocide now commiting genocide.

                You’re part of the problem, stop with the “protest the right way” bullshit.

                • zaph@sh.itjust.works
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  8
                  ·
                  4 months ago

                  So you think it’d be logical and a good move for trans civil rights activists to deface an mlk statue? Since apparently defacing victim monuments is your idea of a productive protest, why isn’t it happening?

                  • Madison420@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    ·
                    4 months ago

                    Do you know remember last year or two when there was a rash of statue defacement that sparked meaningful conversation, you seen to just be I’ll informed based on your two weird comments.

              • Madison420@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                4 months ago

                To bring light to genocide.

                Imagine for a second that Anne frank wasn’t a Jew just the most famous genocide victim of all time, would it then be ok to deface the statue being directly relevant to the reason for protest.

                • LadyAutumn
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  3
                  ·
                  4 months ago

                  But she was Jewish. She was a Jewish victim of a genocide of jewish people. It is a very prominent opinion that those advocating for Palestinian liberation are promoting a genocide of jewish people.

                  • Madison420@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    ·
                    4 months ago

                    Where in that graffiti do you see anti semitic anything.

                    As far as I’m aware red hands means there is blood on their hands and free Gaza means… I suppose this isn’t complicated but “free Gaza”.

                    You are adding anti semitism where there isn’t any.

                • DMBFFF@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  4 months ago

                  Imagine for a second that Anne frank wasn’t a Jew just the most famous genocide victim of all time, would it then be ok to deface the statue being directly relevant to the reason for protest.

                  How would it be relevant to the reason of the protest?

        • LadyAutumn
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          4 months ago

          They did and they were wrong but his walks also did not bolster claims of anti semitism by defacing memorials to holocaust victims

          • Madison420@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            4 months ago

            It bolstered the concept of the “entitled ni**er” at the time, read a newspaper taking about it before it happened.

              • Madison420@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                4 months ago

                I’ll look them up when I get home but your trying to get me to prove racist comments in 1964 and somehow think that’s a high bar to jump.

                Either history escapes you or you are wildly ignorant.

                • DMBFFF@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  4 months ago

                  I’ll look them up when I get home but your trying to get me to prove racist comments in 1964 and somehow think that’s a high bar to jump.

                  Good luck, and try to make them major dailies. Rantings by, say, The KKK Times won’t count.

                  Either history escapes you or you are wildly ignorant.

                  both.

                  • Madison420@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    2
                    ·
                    4 months ago

                    You honestly think it’s going to be hard to find racism in a newspaper from 1964, you know sitting marches about racist shit in newspapers for instance.

                    Bold admission boss, seriously. Your creator has some work to do.

    • LadyAutumn
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      4 months ago

      I get that angle, I do. I just question whether the statement works or not. Do you think the majority of people will interpret these actions that way? Do you think this will paint a good picture of anti-zionist action to the wider international public? Drop the “pro-palestinian” part and the headline reads like probably neo-nazi action. And I do firmly believe that’s how it will be interpreted. I’m a revolutionary leftist like I’m all for taking action this action just serves not to advance the cause but actually to degrade it. This action legitimizes accusations of anti semitism levied at anti zionists. That is exactly how it will be interpreted that is the exact story they will tell.

      They’ll always try and accuse us of being antisemitic, see the college protests for example. But that was contentious like the public was not united in opposition to that because protesting on campus is not on its face value antisemitic. But defacing a statue of a girl who was murdered in a genocide of jewish people does NOT come across as anti-zionist action. We do NOT have to stir up outrage over disrespecting holocaust victims to advocate for Palestinian liberation.

      Not to mention can we not have some respect for Jewish people within our movement? How do you think this makes them feel? An innocent girl who died due to virulent antisemitic hatred being brought into a conflict over another genocide. Jewish people tell us they don’t always feel safe in leftist circles. This is also not helping that in any way

      • Madison420@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        4 months ago

        I think the conversation is only elevated the now annoyed they are about the protest act. Historically effective protest is to literally rattle as many cages as possible, people get annoyed and take a side.

        English suffrage was only gained by breaking windows, burning buildings, donning cardboard armor then learning judo and beating the absolute shit out of cops.

        Ed: I think it’s more disrespectful for her to drag the Jewish faith along with Zionists solely because they claim the same religion, that’s the whole point of attacking a famous Jew that cannot physically be harmed only defaced temporarily.

        • LadyAutumn
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          4 months ago

          To be clear, totally down with civil unrest. This is not civil unrest. This is defacing a statue of a universally known holocaust victim. A victim who was a helpless child.

          Rattling the cage of “innocent victims of genocide” is literally the last fucking cage anyone should ever rattle like what are you talking about. This is the shit that neo nazis do. This action puts us in league with neonazis in the mind of the majority of the public like what do you mean?? Also how is defacing genocide victim statues doing anything to further our cause of international recognition of the genocide of Palestinian?

          Break some windows. Civil unrest, fight back against the states that support this genocide. No question yea do that. Don’t deface Anne Franke statues like I genuinely can’t even believe this has to be said. Again, how do you think this makes jewish anti-zionists feel? Does this make them feel welcome in our movement?

          • Madison420@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            4 months ago

            Correct that’s protest, the fact that you find it repugnant is irrelevant. You’re talking about it, you wouldn’t be if they painted pro Palestine stuff anywhere else.

            Anne and her father are both dead and their family aren’t pro Israel, just as an fyi because their cages literally couldn’t get rattled. I meant people like you, people more wrapped up in the statue and it’s visage than the reason it was defaced in the first place. Yes, everyone protests, that’s not the dig you think it is.

            This is a broken window, it hurts literally no one and says a lot. Are you arguing for other means that often turn more violent than anonymous defacement? Why? You’re valuing a chunk of material depicting a famous over millions of Innocent Palestinians, why is that?

            • DMBFFF@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              5
              ·
              4 months ago

              This is a broken window, it hurts literally no one and says a lot. Are you arguing for other means that often turn more violent than anonymous defacement? Why? You’re valuing a chunk of material depicting a famous over millions of Innocent Palestinians, why is that?

              What’s your opinion of Qur’an burnings and depictions of the pedophile prophet?

              • Madison420@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                4 months ago

                Legit speech, go for it.

                Though I will point out three fact that the only one who’s being objectively racist and bigoted here is you just now with that statement.

                You like Jews and don’t like Muslims, good for you but maybe keep your hate speech to yourself.

                • DMBFFF@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  3
                  ·
                  4 months ago

                  There are many Christians and Muslims, and the few Jews I’ve meet, that I like; but all 3 of their religions are dumb.

                  Calling a man who had sex with a 9 year-old a pedophile isn’t hate speech.

                  • Madison420@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    ·
                    edit-2
                    4 months ago

                    Sure, I don’t disagree religion is dumb.

                    It is, the bible and Torah also have incest and pedophilia, pointing out one but not the others implies one is worse than the others.

                    I didn’t say it was hate speech btw, I said you were being racist and bigoted which you objectively are.

            • LadyAutumn
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              5
              ·
              4 months ago

              Did you miss the part where i said that I understood the intent but am calling out how this makes our movement look like fucking neo nazis? Do you want to re read what I’ve said please before throwing more baseless accusations at me?

              No I wouldn’t give a shit if they painted pro Palestine messages on any non-holocaust related memorials. Because that wouldn’t make us look like neo nazis. This does. People are going to talk about this on the news today and millions of people will shake their head and lend more credence to claims that we are antisemites. And Jewish anti zionists now know that due to their religion some anti zionists are entirely willing to throw them under a bus in the name of “rattling cages”.

              • Madison420@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                5
                ·
                4 months ago

                It doesn’t make anyone look like neo Nazis aside from the people who cannot see duality.

                Yes she’s a Jew, neat.

                She’s also the most famous victim of genocide ever.

                There’s a current genocide that is being committed by isrealis a famously majority Jewish nation.

                The fact that you can’t see her as anything but a Jew is more telling of you than anyone else.

                • LadyAutumn
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  4
                  ·
                  4 months ago

                  Re read the first paragraph of the comment you’re responding to. I’m not interested in continuing this conversation if you are entirely incapable of considering how this will be viewed and how this impacts people without our own movement.

                  • Madison420@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    3
                    ·
                    4 months ago

                    The way it will be viewed is the point!

                    There trying to force people to see that people can be two things, a Jew and a victim of genocide and that dichotomy is important considering the current genocide is being committed by Jews against Palestinians largely because of religious and possesive reasons.

                    I’m not interested in talking with anyone who refuses to go full stop, I don’t enjoy apologists.