• timbuck2themoon@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    3 months ago

    If he was that popular and progressives that numerous he wouldn’t have lost his primary, especially as the incumbent. Simple as.

    • DancingBear@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      3 months ago

      You are clueless as far as actual policies supported by actual Americans. Policy wise, there is pretty much a super majority of Americans that support actual progressive policies

          • timbuck2themoon@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            3 months ago

            Don’t be mad at me that he either sucks or progressives can’t be assed to go vote.

            Im just pointing out your suggestion is laughable because he can’t even win his primary as an incumbent.

            • DancingBear@midwest.social
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              5
              ·
              edit-2
              3 months ago

              Yes because Israel lobby spent the most money in history for any primary seat of congress. One district rep for congress is a little different than the whole country, but yes, money needs to be taken out of politics.

              In other news the capital of Israel is about to get bombed by Iran, which is too bad I guess

                • DancingBear@midwest.social
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  3 months ago

                  I agree with you, money in politics has no influence over our politicians. If someone gave me 100 million dollars I wouldn’t feel obligated to give them taxpayer money or weapons. Lobbyists are just good people trying to make an honest living.

                  I totally agree with you

        • Wes4Humanity@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          3 months ago

          As soon as there’s a candidate that actually represents them… Imagine if the 2 candidates were Trump and Romney, both running as Republicans… Would libs be crying that everyone needs to vote Republican or the Republicans will win? Replace Republican with conservative in that last sentence, and maybe it will clear up why progressives don’t bother voting… There is no one to vote for

          (I’m voting for Kamala, so should everyone)

      • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        3 months ago

        Policy wise, there is pretty much a super majority of Americans that support actual progressive policies

        There’s a huge trust gap in implementation. That’s why Donald Trump threaten a national victory via votes from dying Boomers convinced he’s going to unleash fantasy free health care technology while Bernie Sanders can’t squeak through a primary on the promise of increasing Medicaid enrollments.

        People may want the same things, but they are deeply cynical in who they trust to deliver those policies.

        • DancingBear@midwest.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          3 months ago

          Health care is a fantasy in the United States don’t get sick here it would be cheaper to fly to a hotel in Paris if you are sick I suppose

    • cheeseandrice@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      3 months ago

      That you’re being downvoted for this totally reasonable comment only inches away from a top level comment lamenting a system that silences dissenting views is nice.

      • archomrade [he/him]@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        3 months ago

        Lol because he’s citing the system being critiqued as evidence to make the case that progressive politics aren’t popular

        “This system disadvantages dissenting views”

        “Dissenting views just arent popular, just look at the outcome of this system”

    • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      3 months ago

      If he was that popular and progressives that numerous he wouldn’t have lost his primary

      Propaganda works. You can bombard people with media attacks on a progressive politician to trick people into thinking he’s reactionary. In this case, a heavily Jewish district was flooded with “Jamaal Bowman is antisemetic” messaging for months straight and it cost him the election.

      This has nothing to do with his popularity or his progressive bonafides and everything to do with his cash on hand to run counter-programming.