Dutch beach volleyball player Steven van de Velde, who served time in prison after he was convicted of raping a 12-year-old girl, won his second match at the Paris Olympics and received an even harsher reaction from the crowd on Wednesday than for his first match.

  • PM_Your_Nudes_Please@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    27
    ·
    4 months ago

    That’s a lot of words to say “I agree that this dude who raped a 12 year old should be allowed to hang out at the Olympics where a bunch of young teens often compete and then all sleep in close proximity to one another.”

    • e$tGyr#J2pqM8v@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      4 months ago

      I understand he’s isolated from the other athletes so that doesn’t seem to be the case. The word rape is a misrepresentation of what happened. He hasn’t forced himself on the girl, but it’s misconduct because any sexual contact with a 12 year old is obviously a crime. Still that distinction is important in Dutch law, and rightfully so because obviously forcing yourself on a 12 year old is even worse than consensual sex, and it’s rather bizarre that this is lost in English law and everything is ‘rape’. Again, not defending his actions, but all nuance is lost in this discussion. Yes, to be nuanced you sometimes need more than one sentence.

      • eatthecake@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        15
        ·
        4 months ago

        He got the child drunk and groomed her through facebook so calling it consensual is a misrepresentation. He is a pedophile who raped a child. It is your denial and hand wringing over the consequences for your poor rapist that discourages people from coming forward and testifying. You are telling victims to shut up.

        • e$tGyr#J2pqM8v@feddit.nl
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          4 months ago

          I am not at all telling victims to shut up. You just made that up.

          Dutch courts haven’t found him guilty of rape, but did find him guilty of having sex with a 12 year old. That itself is more than terrible but calling it rape despite this fact is in fact a misrepresentation of what happened. Sure it was terrible thing that he did and I am not defending his actions at all. I am defending his right to participate in sports events and pleading against trial by media/public outrage.

          • eatthecake@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            4 months ago

            His trial is over and he was found guilty. I am free to judge him as I please. There is no law that says the public must pretend crimes never happened once the sentence is done. The notion is absurd.

            • e$tGyr#J2pqM8v@feddit.nl
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              4 months ago

              Never asserted that notion. Of course you’re free to do so. I am just saying it’s self righteous and not helping any one.

      • PM_Your_Nudes_Please@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        4 months ago

        He hasn’t forced himself on the girl groomed a child and convinced her that sex was her idea, but it’s misconduct because any sexual contact with a 12 year old is obviously a crime. Still that distinction is important in Dutch law, and rightfully so because obviously forcing yourself on a 12 year old is even worse than consensual sex statutory rape (because minors can’t consent), and it’s rather bizarre that this is lost in English law and everything is ‘rape’. Again, not it sure sounds like I’m defending his actions, but all nuance is lost in this discussion regarding a man who groomed and raped a 12 year old. Yes, to be nuanced you sometimes need more than one sentence.

        FTFY